NIPNLG, Mar. 27, 2024 "As Congress continuously fails to pass humane immigration legislation, many noncitizens remain vulnerable to removal from the United States. While this legislative failure...
Use the promotional code www.lexisnexis.com/BIB2024 for 20% savings on these titles: Immigration Law Handbook Immigration Law Pocket Field Guide J Visa Guidebook Immigration Law and Procedure ...
US v. Texas "In an effort to stem the tide of illegal immigration into Texas, the state legislature passed a bill known as S. B. 4 that amended various statutes. The new laws prohibit noncitizens...
Mendez Galvez v. Garland (unpub.) "The agency entirely overlooked evidence material to the hardship determination in this case: evidence regarding Mendez’s serious back injury and its implications...
Walmart v. King "The current statutory scheme unconstitutionally "subverts the President's ability to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed - as well as the public's ability...
Filazapovich et al. v. Dept. of State
"For the foregoing reasons, the court (1) grants the Goh Plaintiffs summary judgment ontheir claims that the No-Visa Policy is contrary to law and Defendants unreasonably delayed theirvisa applications; (2) denies the Goh Defendants’ motion for summary judgment except as toPlaintiffs who have already received their diversity visas; (3) denies the Filazapovich Plaintiffs’motion for a preliminary injunction; and (4) grants the Goodluck Plaintiffs’ motion for apreliminary injunction because they are likely to succeed on their claims that the No-Visa Policyis contrary to law, that Defendants unreasonably delayed and unlawfully withheld adjudication oftheir DV-2021 applications, and that Defendants’ prioritization policy is arbitrary and capriciousas applied to diversity visa applicants.The court orders as follows:...."