Not a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Immigration Law

Matter of F-S-N-, 28 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 2020)

Matter of F-S-N-, 28 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 2020) - To prevail on a motion to reopen alleging changed country conditions where the persecution claim was previously denied based on an adverse credibility finding in the underlying proceedings, the respondent must either overcome the prior determination or show that the new claim is independent of the evidence that was found to be not credible.

ED. NOTES:

1.  The panel consists of "Appellate Immigration Judges," no longer "Board Members."

2.  Heavy notice at the end: "If a respondent is subject to a final order of removal and willfully fails or refuses to depart from the United States pursuant to the order, to make timely application in good faith for travel or other documents necessary to depart the United States, or to present himself or herself at the time and place required for removal by the Department of Homeland Security, or conspires to or takes any action designed to prevent or hamper the respondent’s departure pursuant to the order of removal, the respondent shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty of up to $799 for each day the respondent is in violation. See Section 274D of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1324d (2018); 8 C.F.R. § 280.53(b)(14) (2020)."