LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
AAO Hardship Waiver Victory; Adjustment Granted by USCIS

Russell R. Abrutyn writes: "I thought your readers might be interested in this AAO 212(i) hardship waiver decision. The qualifying relatives were the applicant’s parents but the family member with the most significant hardship was the applicant’s niece. The niece suffers from cerebral...

Unpub. BIA Refugee Waiver Victory: Bosnia

"As noted by the Immigration Judge the respondent's omissions are particularly concerning where, as here, the respondent failed to disclose his VRS service, as the organization, and specifically the Zvornik Infantry Brigade's 4th Infantry Battalion where the respondent served, was responsible...

Unpub. BIA 212(c) Victory

Russell Abrutyn writes: "Here is a case that is all about persistence that I thought might be of interest to your readers. When the case began, the respondent, who had lawfully resided in the U.S. since 1969, appeared ineligible for relief under the then-current law. He was convicted of an aggravated...

CA6 on Iraq, Chaldean Christians, Asylum, Misrepresentation: Yousif v. Lynch

"Because the IJ did not determine whether, at the time that Yousif submitted his application, contemporary conditions in Iraq were so dangerous for Chaldean Christians that Yousif would have been eligible for asylum based solely upon his religion, the IJ failed to determine whether Yousif’s...

Unpub. BIA Cancellation, Agg. Fel., Categorical Approach Victory in Michigan

Russell Abrutyn writes: "[Here are] two BIA decisions for a client of ours that may be of interest to your readers. The first decision is the BIA's decision reopening the Respondent's removal proceedings and the second is the BIA's decision affirming a grant of relief . The Respondent...

CA6 on Crime of Violence, Void for Vagueness - Shuti v. Lynch

Shuti v. Lynch, July 7, 2016 - "In Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), the Supreme Court held the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual definition of “violent felony” void for vagueness. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). In this case, we consider whether that pathmarking...