LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Unpub. CA5 Remand Victory: Ramnarine v. Holder

"The BIA certainly did not abuse its discretion in determining cancellation of removal would “likely” be denied due to Ramnarine’s and Raymond’s history of immigration fraud. The BIA, however, applied an incorrect review standard. Along that line, it incorrectly interpreted...

Supreme Court, 8-1, Reverses CA5: Reyes Mata v. Lynch

"An alien ordered to leave the country has a statutory right to file a motion to reopen his removal proceedings. See 8 U. S. C. §1229a(c)(7)(A). If immigration officials deny that motion, a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to consider a petition to review their decision. See Kucana...