LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Ninth Circuit on CIMT, Cal. Penal Code § 422: Latter-Singh v. Holder

"Singh claims that the BIA wrongly determined that a violation of California Penal Code § 422 constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude (or “CIMT”), thus rendering him removable. Although we previously determined that a violation of § 422 is an aggravated felony, see Rosales...

CA9 on Evidence, CIMT: Vargas Cervantes v. Holder (upholding Rotimi)

"We hold that although the BIA correctly determined that Vargas’s conviction under California Penal Code § 422 was for a CIMT and that Vargas is ineligible for an extreme hardship waiver, the BIA erred in concluding that Vargas’s conviction under California Penal Code § 273...

CA9 on Crime of Violence, Agg. Fel. - Ramirez v. Lynch

Ramirez v. Lynch, Jan. 20, 2016 - "Our examination of the text of [California Penal Code] section 273a(a), the Shepard documents, and California case law reveals that the state need not prove that a defendant committed a violation of section 273a(a) under a particular prong; the four prongs are...

CA9 on CIMT - Ramirez-Contreras v. Sessions

Ramirez-Contreras v. Sessions - "California’s Vehicle Code § 2800.2 is not categorically a crime of moral turpitude, and thus, Petitioner is not statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. Petition GRANTED." [Hats off to Angelica Navarro Sigala!]

DACA is Legal; Here's Why

Immigration law scholars filed this powerful amicus brief in a pending 9th Circuit appeal, Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. DHS.