LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
CA3 on habeas, bond, detention: Leslie v. Atty. Gen.

"Petitioner Neville Leslie, a Jamaican alien, has been incarcerated since March 28, 2008 without a bond hearing. He now seeks a bond hearing as provided by 8 U.S.C. § 1226, contending that his continued detention by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) for four...

CA3 on Mandatory Detention, Habeas: Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden

"Chavez-Alvarez appeals the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends that the Government is violating his right to due process by detaining him, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1226(c), without a bond hearing since June 5, 2012. We will reverse the District...

Double Win for Shagin, Burch: CA3 Remands Chavez-Alvarez, Orders Bond Hearing; Gov't Position 'Scarcely Passes the Laugh Test'

Tremendous victories for Valerie Burch and Craig Shagin ! Hats way off! 1. "Jose Juan Chavez-Alvarez petitions the Court for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) [ Matter of Chavez-Alvarez, 26 I&N Dec. 274 (BIA 2014) ], which affirmed the determination of the Immigration...

CA3 on Habeas, Suspension Clause: Castro v. DHS

Castro v. DHS, Aug. 29, 2016 - "We hold that, at least as applied to Petitioners and other similarly situated aliens, § 1252 does not violate the Suspension Clause. Consequently, we will affirm the District Court’s order dismissing Petitioners’ habeas petitions for lack of subject...

Fewer Rights in Pennsylvania than Guantanamo: Some Reactions to Castro v. DHS - David Isaacson

David Isaacson, Sept. 13, 2016 - " On August 29, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its decision in Castro v. Dept. of Homeland Security , a consolidated set of habeas corpus petitions brought by asylum-seekers subject to expedited removal orders and detained within the Eastern...

Cert. Denied in Castro v. DHS (CA3)

Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit erred in holding that the petitioners are not entitled to judicial review of their statutory, regulatory and constitutional claims, even by habeas corpus, and are “prohibited from invoking the protections of the suspension clause"...