by Robert A. Scott
Litigants that have been forced to defend groundless litigation are entitled to recover their attorneys' fees even if those costs were paid by an insurance company, Maryland's highest court has ruled.
In Worsham v. Greenfield [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed an award of litigation expenses in favor of a defendant who had been sued, along with her husband, in a defamation case. The trial court invoked Maryland Rule 1-341 [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], which authorizes trial courts to award litigation costs and attorneys' fees in cases where the court finds the opposing party pursued the litigation "in bad faith or without substantial justification."
The trial court found that the plaintiff had included the wife as a defendant in the lawsuit despite "no evidence" that she was involved in the alleged defamatory conduct and when there was no "colorable reason" to include her.
The plaintiff appealed the sanctions award, arguing that the defendant had not actually" incurred" any attorneys' fees or litigation expenses because those costs had been paid by her insurance company.
The Court of Appeals rejected the plaintiff's argument, holding that the purpose of Maryland Rule 1-341 was to deter abusive litigation.
The court noted that many businesses and professionals maintain some form of liability insurance, which often provides coverage for litigation costs. Prohibiting the award of litigation expenses simply because the defendant has insurance would undermine the purpose of the rule and deprive the courts of an important mechanism for deterring frivolous lawsuits, the court concluded.
Ballard Spahr attorneys regularly defend companies and individuals in commercial litigation. For more information on the decision or its implications, please contact Robert A. Scott at 410.528.5527 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Copyright © 2013 by Ballard Spahr LLP.http://www.ballardspahr.com/(No claim to original U.S. government material.)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.
This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site