By Megan Rahman
The Supreme Court has asked Nike to respond to a cert petition which addresses whether a federal district court is divested of jurisdiction once a defendant in a trademark case promises not to assert its mark against the plaintiff's then-existing commercial activities. On appeal from the Second Circuit [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], the case arises from Nike's lawsuit against YUMS LLC in 2009 for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution under both federal and New York state law. Nike alleged that the design of YUMS' sneakers infringed on the design of Nike's Air Force 1 shoe. YUMS counterclaimed seeking to cancel Nike's registration pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1119. Prior to any decision on the merits, Nike gave YUMS a covenant-not-to-sue, which stated that YUMS' actions no longer infringed or diluted Nike's trademark. While Nike dismissed its case, YUMS wanted to maintain its counterclaim, arguing that Nike's mark continued to improperly chill its innovative marketing efforts. The district court dismissed YUMS' case, however, finding that the covenant not to sue left no ongoing case or controversy to allow it to continue to assert its jurisdiction. The Second Circuit affirmed, holding that 15 U.S.C. § 1119 does not provide federal courts with an independent basis for jurisdiction absent an actual case or controversy between the parties.
YUMS' petition argues that the Second Circuit's ruling allows litigants to avoid unexpected resistance by delivering a covenant not to sue and evading any test of the validity of the asserted registration. In early March, Nike had waived it right to file a response to the petition. Nike has until May 4 to respond to the petition.
Copyright © 2012, Troutman Sanders LLP
Virginia intellectual property lawyers &
attorneys of Troutman Sanders Law Firm, offering services related to
patent litigation, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, service marks
and unfair competition, serving Virginia, Maryland, Washington D.C. and
the Eastern United States.
Troutman Sanders LLP - ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A
VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR
Lexis.com subscribers can explore/search Trademark Law resources on Lexis.com or access any of these
Mathew Bender Trademark Law publications:
Non-subscribers can purchase Trademark Law
treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications from the LexisNexis Bookstore
For more information about LexisNexis products and
solutions connect with us through our corporate