Success in Halting Infringement Case Varies Across Courts/Judges
Courts have the inherent power to manage their dockets, including the
authority to stay patent infringement litigation pending the conclusion
of a Patent Office reexamination. For this reason, patent reexamination
parallel to a district court/ITC litigation is often initiated in an
attempt to stay the more cost prohibitive court proceeding.
Perceptions as to whether or not a stay is warranted will vary
significantly, even though the same analysis is performed by each court.
(See factor based analysis here). Attitudes vary across courts (ITC v. EDTX, v NDCA), even amongst judges of the same court.
Thus, a threshold determination for any defendant becomes:
How does Court/Judge X view requests for patent reexamination?...and is there somewhere I can find this information?
Statistics for 2008-2011 are found below for many of the major district courts. (click to enlarge)
There are many database services that will provide such information,
some at a significant cost. This report was easily generated using the Docket Navigator Database, I find this service more cost effective and user friendly than others.
View more from Patents Post-Grant.
For more information about LexisNexis products and
solutions connect with us through our corporate