By Robert Angle
January 26, 2012, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. ("Bear Creek") filed a
Notice of Filing Motion for Multi-District Litigation pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407, in Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Civil Action No.: 2:11-cv-103 (RAJ/FBS). This is an interesting new chapter in this long-running saga.
Back on February 22, 2011, Bear
Creek launched patent litigation against 23 different telecommunications
companies in the EDVA, and the case was assigned to Judge Raymond A.
Jackson in the Norfolk Division. After numerous several months and
numerous (340+) docket entries, Judge Jackson -- perhaps anticipating
the AIA -- raised the issue of misjoinder sua sponte and
pursuant to several motions to sever, and then proceeded to drop all of
the defendants except RCN Telecom Services (the first named defendant in
the case). That August 17, 2011 Memorandum Opinion and Order can be
Bear Creek proceeded to file new actions against the former defendants
in the EDVA (Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Aptela, Inc. , 2:11-cv-00460 (RGD/TEM); Bear
Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Primus Telecommunications, Inc., et al.,
2:11-cv-00461 (HCM/FBS)), the North District of Georgia (Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Cox Communications, Inc., 1:11-cv-03784 (AT)), and the District of Delaware (Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Bear Creek Technologies, Inc., 1:11-cv-00721-GMS (D. Del.); Charter Communications, Inc. v. Bear Creek Technologies, Inc., 1:11-cv-00722-GMS (D. Del.); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings Corporation, et al., 1:11-cv-00723-GMS (D. Del.); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. CSC Holdings, LLC, 1:11-cv-00724-GMS (D. Del); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Mediacom Communications Corporation, et al., 1:11-cv-00725-GMS (D. Del); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Qwest Communications International, Inc. et al., 1:11-cv-00726-GMS (D. Del.); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 1:11-cv-00727-GMS (D. Del.); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. 8x8, Inc., 1:11-cv-00728-GMS (D. Del); Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc., et al., 1:11-cv-00729-GMS (D. Del); and Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al., 1:11-cv-00730-GMS (D. Del)).
Perhaps liking what it found in
Delaware, Bear Creek is now moving to have the EDVA cases and the
Northern District of Georgia case transferred to the District of
Delaware, and to have all of the cases consolidated for purposes of
Multi-District Litigation. A copy of the Notice filed by Bear Creek in
the Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Civil Action No.: 2:11cv00103 (RAJ/FBS) can be found here.
Plainly, Bear Creek did not intend
to set out on this tortured path, but it may well achieve the
consolidation of its claims against 28 different defendants by a
different means. Given the limitations of joinder under the
AIA, perahps MDL will be the new pathway to consolidating cases against
multiple defendants ... if Bear Creek's efforts are successful.
Copyright © 2011, Troutman Sanders LLP
Virginia intellectual property lawyers &
attorneys of Troutman Sanders Law Firm, offering services related to
patent litigation, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, service marks
and unfair competition, serving Virginia, Maryland, Washington D.C. and
the Eastern United States.
Troutman Sanders LLP - ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A
VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR
PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE.
Lexis.com subscribers can explore/search Patent Law resources on Lexis.com or access any of these Mathew Bender Patent Law publications:
Non-subscribers can purchase Patent Law
treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications from the LexisNexis Bookstore
For more information about LexisNexis products and
solutions connect with us through our corporate