For patent seekers and patent attorneys alike, March 16, 2013 will be a momentous date. On that day, the U.S. transitions from its current "first-to-invent" system to a "first-inventor-to-file" (FITF) system. Although the FITF system has been in place in every other country in the world for some time, U.S. companies are rightfully concerned about how best to prosecute patents under the new scheme.
While the new FITF system simplifies the determination of who is entitled to a patent on an invention, the current system offers numerous benefits to applicants for patents. One major benefit for pre-AIA applications is the ability to swear behind a cited reference based on the inception/conception date of the invention claimed in the application. That ability will no longer exist once the AIA provisions take effect. In addition, AIA provisions have expanded the scope of available prior art that can be used to reject patent applications. Thus, certain related art may not be prior art under pre-AIA while being prior art under post-AIA. Another benefit is that pre-AIA applications are not susceptible to an invalidity challenge under the new Post-Grant Review provisions of the AIA. A further benefit is that pre-AIA applications are less susceptible to pre-issuance prior art submissions by third parties, which is liberalized in post-AIA practice.
Any regular, provisional, continuation, continuation-in-part and divisional patent applications filed before March 16, 2013 will be evaluated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under the pre-AIA first-to-invent system. Thus, patent applicants will benefit from pursuing patent protection now for all inventions conceived before March 16, 2013, so as to preserve the first-to-invent advantage.
BEFORE MARCH 16, 2013
Companies and inventors should take full advantage of the current system before the transition to AIA. From now until the FITF provisions become effective, companies and inventors should accelerate their invention development and generation of invention disclosures. They should also proceed quickly to review all existing invention disclosures, make decisions on patent filings and proceed with patent applications on all worthwhile inventions.
Patenting DecisionsPatent review committees should plan to meet frequently to hasten decisions relating to any new or existing invention disclosures. The committee should assess any outstanding invention disclosures for commercial or strategic importance and consider the following actions:
Invention DisclosuresCompanies should require both prolific and non-prolific inventors to review their projects and submit new invention disclosures as quickly as possible for review by the corporate patent review committee.
Provisional Patent ApplicationsCompanies should consider the strategic use of provisional applications as the FITF effective date approaches. Provisional applications and their subsequent non-provisional counterparts will have the full complement of pre-AIA benefits. Companies should determine which inventions merit the effort of filing provisional applications, bearing in mind that any provisional application should describe a sufficiently enabled preferred embodiment and include claims and drawings. Embodiments that are non-enabled in a provisional application and subsequently enabled in a related post-AIA non-provisional application will result in the entire application being treated as a post-AIA filing.
Proceeding Before March 16, 2013If you have any questions regarding these important changes, or if you need to proceed with patent application filings before the upcoming AIA implementation date, please contact your Brinks attorney as soon as possible or visit the Patent Reform section of our website at www.usebrinks.com.
* * *
This Strategy Briefing is intended to provide information of general interest to the public and is not intended to offer legal advice about specific situations or problems. Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione does not intend to create an attorney-client relationship by offering this information and review of the information shall not be deemed to create such a relationship. You should consult a lawyer if you have a legal matter requiring attention. For further information, please contact a Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione lawyer.
© 2013 Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer
Sign in with your Lexis.com ID to access Patent Law resources on Lexis.com or any of these Mathew Bender Patent Law publications.
Click here to order Patent Law treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications.
View the LexisNexis
Catalog of Legal and Professional Publications
here for a list of available LexisNexis eBooks.
Click here to learn more about
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.