The role of social media in the workplace has taken
center stage over the past couple months as the National Labor Relations Board
has issued numerous complaints against union and non-union companies alleging
violations of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. The complaints
clearly signal the NLRB's disapproval of overbroad social media policies as
well as the disapproval of adverse actions taken against employees who are
engaging in "protected concerted activity" and discussing their working
conditions, wages, or hours on social networks such as Twitter and Facebook.
The following are some of the cases making the headlines:
Karl Knauz Motors -
On Friday May 20, 2011, a complaint was issued against the luxury car dealer
after it terminated an employee when he posted on his Facebook page concerns
about the handling of a sales event that could impact the company's employees'
Hispanics United of Buffalo -
The complaint alleges that the nonprofit unlawfully discharged five
employees after the employees criticized their working conditions on Facebook.
According to the NLRB's website "the Facebook discussion was protected
concerted activity within the meaning of Section 7 of the National Labor
Relations Act, because it involved a conversation among coworkers about their
terms and conditions of employment, including their job performance and
Thomson Reuters Corp. - A
reporter was disciplined for sending a tweet stating, "One way to make this the
best place to work is to deal honestly with Guild members." In this case, a
settlement was reached before a complaint was issued, as Thomson Reuters and
the Newspaper Guild of New York tentatively agreed on a three-year contract and
agreed to settle the issues related to the members' use of Twitter. This would
have been the first NLRB complaint involving Twitter.
Lee Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Arizona Daily
- The NLRB Associate General Counsel's Division of Advice concluded that a
termination by the regional newspaper was lawful. A reporter who covered the
crime and public safety beat posted numerous tweets that were determined to not
involve protected concerted activity. Rather, the tweets were described in the
Advice Memorandum as "inappropriate and offensive." This case shows that
companies do not necessarily have their hands tied when employees engage in
unprofessional and inappropriate conduct online that does not relate or
touch on protected concerted activity. The Memorandum explained that
"[t]he Board has consistently held that 'an employer's imposition of discipline
pursuant to an unlawfully overbroad policy or rule constitutes a violation of
the Act.' However, the Board has found discipline pursuant to an
overbroad rule to be unlawful only where the underlying conduct involved
Section 7 activity."
Build.com - The web-based home
improvement retailer settled a claim relating to the termination of a non-union
employee who was terminated after she posted comments about her company on
American Medical Response of Connecticut - A
settlement was reached in this case regarding an employee who was
terminated after posting negative comments about her supervisor on Facebook.
The ambulance company agreed to, among other things, revise its overly broad
policies to make clear they do not restrict employees from discussing their
wages and other conditions of employment.
The inherent tension with social media and the workplace
is that, on one hand, companies are trying to protect themselves and their
customers against employees who are making false and derogatory statements,
disclosing trade secrets or other confidential and proprietary information, and
spending their work hours and the company resources posting comments
online. On the other hand, companies are not permitted to infringe on an
employee's right to discuss the terms and conditions of his or her employment
with or on the authority of other employees. Overbroad social media
policies that restrict employees from discussing the terms and conditions of
their employment- whether they are union members or not - are prohibited.
One step companies can take to help limit their exposure
and liability is to implement carefully-drafted social media policies that
define the parameters of what is and is not permitted conduct on social
networking sites. The social media policies oftentimes interplay with the
traditional codes of conduct that already exist and define concepts that may be
unique to the ever-changing and evolving electronic world.
Read more articles on employment law issues
at Employment and the
Law, a blog by Ashley Kasarjian
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.