Union Membership Took Big Hit in 2012

Union Membership Took Big Hit in 2012

The number of American workers grew by 2.4 million in 2012. But fewer of them were members of a union. In fact, the national union membership rate fell last year to its lowest level in nearly a century. And there's no shortage of reasons for that decline.
 
Union membership in the United States has generally been in a state of decline since the 1950s, when it peaked at about 25 percent. But last year's drop was precipitous: 400,000 members, according to a report last month from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), taking the total to 14.3 million. That represents about 11.3 percent of the total U.S. workforce, the lowest union membership rate since 1916, when it stood at 11.2 percent, according to a study by Rutgers economists Leo Troy and Neil Sheflin. 
 
Labor experts say several factors contributed to the steep decline. One is the recent laws passed in Wisconsin, Indiana and other states rolling back the power of public employee unions. The BLS report showed that Wisconsin and Indiana were among the states with the highest union-membership drops last year, 13 percent and 18 respectively. Public-sector unions as a whole didn't fare well, shedding 234,000 members and about 1 percent of their membership rate, which now stands at 35.9 percent. 
 
"I am really surprised that the drop in unionization was as large as it is in a single year, and it was particularly big in the public sector," said Barry T. Hirsch, a labor economist at Georgia State University: "It does seem you are seeing reductions in some of the states that you might expect." 
 
Private-sector unions didn't do too much better last year, with manufacturers like Boeing and Volkswagen continuing their expansion into nonunion states and job gains coming to industry sectors that aren't heavily unionized like retail and restaurants. There were signs of resistance to the latter trend in the Black Friday protests at Walmarts across the country and the one-day fast-food-worker strike in New York City in November. 
 
Union officials say the unions aren't to blame for the decline in membership. 
 
"It's not a simple story that we don't have our act together," said William Spriggs, chief economist for the A.F.L.-C.I.O. 
 
Spriggs said although it may just sound like "bellyaching," Republicans are "really being vindictive against unions, and employers campaign very hard against workers unionizing." 
 
Gary N. Chaison, a professor of industrial relations at Clark University's Graduate School of Management in Worcester, Massachusetts, said now actually seems like the perfect time for unions to be attracting members. 
 
"Workers should be looking to unions because of job insecurity and stagnant wages," he said, adding "but they're not." 
 
The BLS report indicated that unionized workers, in fact, earned over 20 percent more than their nonunionized counterparts last year, $943 per week versus $742, although that difference reflects a variety of factors, including variations in the earnings of union and nonunion members based on occupation, industry, firm size and geographic region. 
 
But Glenn Spencer, vice president of the Workforce Freedom Initiative of the United States Chamber of Commerce, said with workers no longer spending their entire working lives at a single company and changing jobs more frequently, they no longer see the benefit of union membership. 
 
"Unions have fundamentally had a hard time conveying to workers what their value proposition is, how they're really going to make workers' lives better," he said. "And if you look at union contracts and their rigid work rules, there is no incentive for employers to embrace unions either." 
 
The news from last year wasn't all bad for unions, however; membership actually grew in more than a dozen states and by double digits in most of them. (See Bird's eye view in this issue.) But other statistics, such as the decline of private-sector union membership to 6.6 percent last year from 6.9 percent the year before - and from its peak of around 35 percent in the 1950s - point to a much less certain future for organized labor. 
 
"To employers, it's going to look like the labor movement is ready for a knockout punch," said Clark University professor Gary Chaison. "You can't be a movement and get smaller." (NEW YORK TIMES, ATLANTICWIRE.COM, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, PUBLIC PERSPECTIVE, TIMESFREEPRESS.COM)

The above article is provided by the State Net Capitol Journal. State Net is the nation's leading source of state legislative and regulatory content for all states within the United States. State Net daily monitors every bill in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Congress - as well as every state agency regulation. Virtually all of the information about individual bills and their progress through legislatures is online within 24 hours of public availability.

To subscribe to the Capitol Journal and access archived issue go to the State Net Capitol Journal

If you are a lexis.com subscriber, you can access State Net Bill Tracking, State Net Full Text of Bills, or State Net Regulatory Text. If you are interested in learning more about State Net, contact us.

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.