Overview: Petitioners did not
violate employee's Fourth Amendment rights by obtaining and reviewing
transcript of text messages sent to him on pager provided by city because
search was justified because there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that
search was necessary for noninvestigatory work-related purpose, and search was
permissible in its scope.
Judges: Kent L. Richland argued
the cause for petitioners.
K. Katyal argued the cause for the
United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of court.
Dammeier argued the cause for
OPINION BY: KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the
Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and STEVENS, THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, ALITO,
and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except for Part
III-A. STEVENS, J., filed a concurring opinion. SCALIA, J., filed an opinion
concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
can view the enhanced version of
City of Ontario v. Quon
can view the free, unenhanced version of City of Ontario v. Quon on lexisONE's Free Case Law
Podcast: the U.S. Supreme Court's
Decision in City of Ontario v. Quon