Staub v. Proctor Hosp., 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1900, (March 1, 2011)

Staub v. Proctor Hosp., 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1900, (March 1, 2011)

LexisNexis Overview: Where a vice president fired an employee who was a member of the United States Army Reserve, the employer was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law regarding the "cat's paw" discrimination claim under USERRA, because, inter alia, there was evidence that supervisors were motivated by antimilitary animus and their actions were causal factors.

Counsel: Eric Schnapper argued the cause for petitioner.

Roy G. Davis  argued the cause for respondent.

Judges: SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. ALITO, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which THOMAS, J., joined. KAGAN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Staub v. Proctor Hosp.

Non-subscribers can view the free, unenhanced version of Staub v. Proctor Hosp. on lexisONE's Free Case Law

Lexis.com subscribers may also view the Supreme Court Briefs in this case.