A broadly worded defense in a case challenging the sale of a company resulted in a waiver of the attorney-client and work product privileges last week, in Richardson v. Frontier Spinning Mills, Inc.
Richardson claimed that the company had improperly structured its sale so that non-employee shareholders like him were paid less for their stock than the shareholders who were employed by Frontier and that the company had failed to disclose material facts regarding the transaction. The company defended by asserting that it had relied on the advice of its corporate counsel in how the sale was structured.
It is not unusual for counsel defending corporate directors to raise an "advice of counsel" defense because G.S. §55-8-30 says that directors may rely upon information provided by "[l]egal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within their professional or expert competence" in discharging their duties as directors.
According to the Business Court, there is "ample authority" that the raising of such a defense results in a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. Given that the scope of waiver is often a "thorny issue" (Op. Par. 9), a defense relying on Section 55-8-30 should be carefully worded.
Please click here to read the entire post.
Read this article in its entirety on North Carolina Business Litigation Report, a blog for lawyers focusing on issues of North Carolina business law and the day-to-day practice of business litigation in North Carolina courts.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.