LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments On Setting Damage Limitations

WASHINGTON, D.C.- (Mealey's) Courts must calculate the amount in controversy in class suits rather than focus on the amount being sought by a class representative in deciding in which jurisdiction a class complaint belongs, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Los Angeles argued...

U.S. High Court: Class Rep's Damages Limit Doesn't Defeat Federal Jurisdiction

WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Mealey's) A class representative's stipulation that damages being sought were less than $5 million does not defeat federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled March 19 ( The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Greg Knowles...

Ballard Spahr LLP: Supreme Court To Decide Evidentiary Requirements for Removal Notices in Class Actions

By Burt M. Rublin and Jonathan E. Selkowitz The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the issue of what, if any, evidence a defendant must present in a notice of removal to remove a case to federal court based on the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). In granting the petition for a writ of certiorari...

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In CAFA Evidence Appeal

WASHINGTON, D.C. — (Mealey’s) The plain language of 28 U.S. Code Section 1446(a) requires only “a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal,” not evidence, the attorney representing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. LLC and Cherokee Basin Pipeline LLC argued Oct. 7...