LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
5th Circuit: Mensing Doesn't Make Brand-Name Defendants Liable For Injuries

NEW ORLEANS - (Mealey's) The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that preempts failure-to-warn claims involving generic drugs does not change Louisiana state law and make manufacturers of brand-name versions liable, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Oct. 25 ( Julie Demahy v. Schwarz Pharma...

U.S. High Court Allows Solicitor General To Argue For Drug Design Defect Preemption

WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Mealey's) The U.S. solicitor general will be allowed to argue March 19 that design defect claims involving generic drugs are preempted by federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court decided March 4 in granting the federal government's motion to participate in oral arguments ( Mutual...

Alabama High Court Again Says Brand-Name Drug Makers Liable In Generic Injury Case

MONTGOMERY, Ala. —(Mealey’s) A brand-name drug manufacturer may be liable under Alabama law for fraud or misrepresentation in a drug label used by generic drug makers, the Alabama Supreme Court held Aug. 15 after reconsidering its 2013 decision in a Reglan/metoclopramide case ( Wyeth, Inc...

Failure-To-Update Claims For Generic Drugs Not Preempted In New Jersey, Court Says

TRENTON, N.J. — (Mealey’s) A New Jersey state appeals court panel on Nov. 12 affirmed a lower court ruling that generic drug manufacturers can be sued for failure to update their labels with warnings added to the labels of the predecessor drug ( In Re: Reglan Litigation , No. A-2014-13T4...