9th Circuit Reverses Ruling Finding Cell Service Arbitration Agreement Invalid

9th Circuit Reverses Ruling Finding Cell Service Arbitration Agreement Invalid

SEATTLE - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 16 reversed a trial court ruling rejecting an arbitration agreement between cell service providers and their customers in a breach of contract and unjust enrichment class suit and remanded, ordering that Washington choice-of-law rules be applied to the customers' procedural unconscionability arguments (Marygrace Coneff, et al. v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. 09-35563, 9th Cir.; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5520).

Lexis.com subscribers may access Class Action and Litigation Practice & Procedure resources on Lexis.com. Mealey's subscribers may search Mealey's Litigation Reports by Practice Area.

Additional Litigation resources, including Emerging Issues Analysis are available in the LexisNexis Store.

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®