SEATTLE - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 16 reversed a trial court ruling rejecting an arbitration agreement between cell service providers and their customers in a breach of contract and unjust enrichment class suit and remanded, ordering that Washington choice-of-law rules be applied to the customers' procedural unconscionability arguments (Marygrace Coneff, et al. v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. 09-35563, 9th Cir.; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5520).
Lexis.com subscribers may access Class Action and Litigation Practice & Procedure resources on Lexis.com. Mealey's subscribers may search Mealey's Litigation Reports by Practice Area.
Additional Litigation resources, including Emerging Issues Analysis are available in the LexisNexis Store.