WASHINGTON, D.C. - A New Jersey federal judge committed no error in concluding that a patent and copyright infringement plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted because his complaint failed to identify any infringing product or process that is or was made, used or sold by the defendants, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held March 22 (Pieczenik v. Bayer Corp., Fed. Cir., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5986).
Lexis.com subscribers may access Copyright, Patent and Trademark Law resources on Lexis.com. Mealey's subscribers may search Mealey's Litigation Reports by Practice Area. Follow this link to access Chisum on Patents. Also, Search Nimmer on Copyright on Lexis.com. Additional Intellectual Property Law resources are available in the LexisNexis Store.