No Coverage Owed For Sexual Molestation Claims, 9th Circuit Determines

No Coverage Owed For Sexual Molestation Claims, 9th Circuit Determines

SAN FRANCISCO - An insurer has no duty to provide coverage to its insured for sexual molestation claims because the policy's sexual molestation exclusion clearly precludes coverage, the Ninth U.S. Court of Appeals said July 15 (Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Nicole Johnson Riverson et al., No. 12-35529, 9th Cir.; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14279).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®