Panel: Court Did Not Err In Relying On Testimony Of Insurer's Expert Witness

Panel: Court Did Not Err In Relying On Testimony Of Insurer's Expert Witness

NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana appeals panel on Aug. 21 found that a lower court did not err in relying on an expert witness' opinion that an insured's structural damage was caused by soil subsidence and not wind, affirming the lower court's ruling in favor of the homeowners insurer in a Hurricane Katrina coverage dispute (James And Rebecca Wallace, et al. v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, et al., No. 2013-CA-0075, La. App., 4th Cir.; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1697).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®