Rival May Continue With Claims Arising From Exclusive Agreements, Judge Rules

Rival May Continue With Claims Arising From Exclusive Agreements, Judge Rules

WILMINGTON, Del. - A manufacturer who claimed that its rival violated federal antitrust law by prohibiting its distributors from marketing competitor's products sufficiently alleged antitrust injury to survive a motion to dismiss, a federal judge in Delaware ruled Sept. 23 (GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc., No. 12-1318, D. Del.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135252).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®