Summary Judgment Partly Granted In Dispute Over Burnt Manufactured Home

Summary Judgment Partly Granted In Dispute Over Burnt Manufactured Home

EUGENE, Ore. - Granting in part and denying in part cross-motions for summary judgment by an insurer and a policyholder in a home fire coverage suit, an Oregon federal judge on Oct. 21 determined that the insurer did not act in bad faith by denying replacement costs for a home that was not of "like kind and quality" to the one that was destroyed (Malinda Hoffman v. Foremost Signature Insurance Co., No. 6:12-cv-01534, D. Ore.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150819).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®