Judge Finds Standing, Specificity In Splenda Web Advertising Claims

Judge Finds Standing, Specificity In Splenda Web Advertising Claims

SAN FRANCISCO - Inconsistencies in allegations of website exposure between complaints do not warrant dismissal of a California unfair competition law (UCL) claim challenging the advertising of Splenda, a federal judge held Oct. 21 (Barbara Bronson, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. and McNeil Nutritionals Inc., No. 12-4184, N.D. Calif.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151842).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®