Hedonic Damages Opinion Lacks Reliable Basis, New Jersey Judge Concludes

Hedonic Damages Opinion Lacks Reliable Basis, New Jersey Judge Concludes

JERSEY CITY, N.J. - A New Jersey trial judge held Nov. 12 that an accident victim's hedonic damages expert could not testify because his "willingness to pay" opinion was unreliable (Shalome and Joe Johnson v. George Redd, et al., No. HUD-L-855-11, N.J. Super., Hudson, Co.; 2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2739).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®