PHILADELPHIA - There is no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether a federal flood insurer paid all that was validly claimed of it for insureds' losses arising from a flooded stream, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled Nov. 27, rejecting the insureds' claims seeking an additional $20,864.28 in damages (Francis Rudi, et al. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., No. 2:11-cv-04362-WY, E.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168618).