INDIANAPOLIS - A federal magistrate judge in Indiana on Jan. 17 overruled a third party's motion for a protective order over the contents of its investigation file after finding that the information was not subject to the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine (Telamon Corporation v. The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, et al., No. 13-cv-00382-RLY-DML, S.D. Ind.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6583).