CINCINNATI - A federal magistrate judge in Ohio on Feb. 3 granted plaintiffs' request to vacate confidentiality over portions of the deposition testimony given by a defendant company's general manager, finding that the information does not qualify for protection under a protective order the parties entered into (Glenn Graff, et al. v. Haverhill North Coke Company, et al., No. 09-cv-670, S.D. Ohio; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13180).