Mealey's IP/Tech - Apple Motion To Strike Expert Testimony Denied In Part

Mealey's IP/Tech - Apple Motion To Strike Expert Testimony Denied In Part

SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal magistrate judge on March 14 found that a patent plaintiff's revised infringement contentions provide sufficient disclosure of the theory of induced infringement, even if those contentions fail to identify the alleged third-party infringers by name (Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 11-1079, N.D. Calif.).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®