Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - UCL Claims Doomed By Failure Of Commercial Code Allegations, Judge Finds

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - UCL Claims Doomed By Failure Of Commercial Code Allegations, Judge Finds

SAN DIEGO - A federal judge on June 23 dismissed a California consumer's class action claims that Wal-Mart Inc. violates the state unfair competition law (UCL) by misrepresenting the benefits of a dietary supplement product after finding that the consumer failed to allege facts establishing a minimum regulatory standard for the supplement (Thamar Santisteban Cortina v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 13-2054, S.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85941).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®