OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on Nov. 14 granted a Bulgarian machine-building company's petition to confirm a $2,119,167.79 international arbitral award issued against a California company, finding that enforcement of the award was not against public policy (TMCO Ltd. v. Green Light Energy Solutions R&D Corp., No. 4:17-cv-00997, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188362).
BEAUMONT, Texas - A panel of the Ninth District Texas Court of Appeals on Nov. 16 affirmed a verdict in favor of a hospital where a man was given an injection and developed severe pain in his leg following the injection after finding that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (Lonnie D. Rodgers Sr. v. The Medical Center of Southeast Texas, No. 09-16-00276-CV, Texas App., 9th Dist., 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10764).
LOS ANGELES - A homeowner "who is aware, long before a rainstorm occurs and causes damage, of possible leakage" caused by construction defects cannot reasonably expect an insurer to pay for repairs on the theory that rainwater, and not the defects, caused the damage, a California appeals panel affirmed Nov. 14 (Simon Cohen, et al. v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co., No. B276060, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 8, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7779).
WICHITA, Kan. - A plaintiff in a misappropriation of trade secrets lawsuit against its former employee and direct competitor has failed to show that expedited discovery is warranted in the action under Kansas' reasonableness or good cause test because, among other things, the plaintiff's discovery sought is overly broad, a federal magistrate judge in Kansas ruled Nov. 15 in denying the plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery (HydroChem LLC v. Loren Keating, et al., No. 17-1281, D. Kan., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188467).
SEATTLE - An employer's use of a workweek average to arrive at the appropriate pay rate for employees doesn't violate the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as it provides employees with wages that meet the minimum wage, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Nov. 15, noting that whether the employees have a contract claim is beyond the scope of the interlocutory appeal (Kristy Douglas, et al. v. Xerox Business Services, LLC, et al., No. 16-35425, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22967).
SHREVEPORT, La. - A Louisiana appeals panel on Nov. 15 affirmed a $500,000 verdict in a medical malpractice suit after finding that the trial court did not err by excluding the credibility evidence of the expert of a woman who claimed that a doctor breached the standard of care that caused her husband's death (Wynona Johnson v. Tyrone Tucker M.D., et al., No. 51,723-CA, La. App., 2nd Cir., 2017 La. App. LEXIS 2056).
SAN DIEGO - A California appeals panel on Nov. 14 reversed an entry of summary judgment to an insurer on its duty to defend construction defect claims under subcontractors' policies but affirmed summary judgment to a second insurer, finding that it has no duty to defend (McMillin Management Services L.P., et al. v. Financial Pacific Insurance Co., et al., No. D069814, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 1, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 1000).
LOS ANGELES - A Santa Ana, Calif.-based business will pay $105,000 to end claims that it paid a female sales representative less than her male co-worker, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced Nov. 15, one day after the consent decree of order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Spec Formliners, Inc., et al., No. 16-2066, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS).
RICHMOND, Va. - Shareholders in a securities class action lawsuit against an energy provider and its CEO have failed to show that the CEO acted with the requisite scienter in misrepresenting to investors that the company had secured a contract renewal with a large customer because they have not shown that he knew his statements were misleading at the time he made them, a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Nov. 15 in affirming a federal judge's dismissal of the action (Maguire Financial LP, et al. v. PowerSecure International Inc., et al., No. 16-2163, 4th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22968).
SEATTLE - A Washington federal judge on Nov. 14 denied an insurer's motion to dismiss a bad faith claim alleged against an insurer by an insured in an auto coverage dispute suit after determining that questions of fact exists as to whether the insurer acted reasonably in handling the insured's claim for underinsured motorist benefits (Lika Oung v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., et al, No. 16-1200, W.D. Wash., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188393).
LOS ANGELES - A California jury on Nov. 16 returned a verdict in favor of Johnson & Johnson in the first ever cosmetic-talc asbestos case taken to trial against the company, while also handing a defense verdict to the company that mined the raw talc, sources told Mealey Publications (Tina Herford, et al. v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. BC646315, Calif. Super., Los Angeles Co.).
BOSTON - The First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 15 found that the presence of an embezzlement counterclaim in a dispute between an employer insured and its former employee fails to generate a conflict of interest that entitles the insured to separate counsel to defend against an underlying wrongful termination lawsuit at its employment practices liability insurer's expense (Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Co. v. VisionAid Inc., 15-1351, 1st Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22906).
AMHERST, S.D. - TransCanada Corp. announced Nov. 16 that it shut down its Keystone pipeline after it experienced a leak in South Dakota that resulted in an oil spill of 210,000 gallons, or 5,000 barrels, of oil.
DALLAS - A Texas federal jury on Nov. 16 awarded six plaintiffs $247.49 million in the fourth multidistrict litigation bellwether trial involving the DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. Pinnacle hip (In Re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 11-md-02244, Ramon Alicea, et al. v. DePuy Orthopaedics., Inc., et al., No. 15-03489, Uriel Barzel v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. 16-1245, Karen Kirschner v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. 16-1526, Hazel Miura v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. 13-4119, Michael A. Stevens v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. 14-1776, Eugene Stevens Jr. v. DePuy Orthopaedics, et al., No. 14-2341, N.D. Texas).
CHICAGO - Jurors in the first testosterone replacement therapy multidistrict bellwether trial involving Testim on Nov. 16 found in favor of defendant Auxilium Pharmaceuticals LLC (In Re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2545, Steve Holtsclaw v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al., No. 15-3941, N.D. Ill.).
SCRANTON, Pa. - A Pennsylvania jury on Nov. 15 returned a defense verdict for a handful of boiler and furnace manufacturers and parts supply houses, finding that the asbestos-containing products in question were not unreasonably dangerous and that none of the five defendants acted negligently (Diane Horst, et al. v. Union Carbide Corp., et al., No. 15 CV 1903, Pa. Comm. Pls., Lackawanna Co.).
PHILADELPHIA - A district court did not err in finding that a disability insurer's termination of long-term disability benefits under the plan's any-occupation standard was not arbitrary and capricious because the termination is supported by substantial evidence, the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Nov. 13 (Kristen Ann Davies v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., No. 17-1782, 3rd Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22656).
SHERMAN, Texas - An information technology specialist can testify about whether statements made to investors by the CEO of a computer server development company were false, but cannot opine on whether the statements were misleading, a Texas federal judge ruled Nov. 14 (Securities and Exchange Commission v. William E. Mapp, III, No. 4:16-cv-00246, E.D. Texas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188083).
TOLEDO, Ohio - An architectural expert in a home design copyright infringement action cannot opine that a company's designs do not merit copyright protection because the opinion is an impermissible legal conclusion, though the expert can testify about the similarities and differences between the parties' designs, an Ohio federal judge held Nov. 14 (Design Basics LLC v. Forrester Wehrle Homes, Inc., et al., No. 3:15-cv-00666, N.D. Ohio, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188005).
SAN FRANCISCO - Uber Technologies Inc. has failed to perform adequate background checks on its drivers prior to hiring and has failed to monitor them after hiring, resulting in passengers - primarily females - suffering sexual harassment and assaults, two unnamed Jane Does allege in a Nov. 14 class complaint filed in a California federal court alleging violations of the Unfair Fraudulent and Unfair Business Practices Act and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 17-6571, N.D. Calif.).
HELENA, Mont. - W.R. Grace's bankruptcy order enjoining new litigation tolled the Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA) three-year statute of limitations for suing an associated railroad that allegedly exposed a worker to asbestos-contaminated vermiculite, the Montana Supreme Court held Nov. 14 (Kelly G. Watson v. BNSF Railway Co., et al., No. DA 17-0229, Mont. Sup., 2017 Mont. LEXIS 678).
WILMINGTON, Del. - Two companies supplied tons of asbestos-containing paper to a manufacturer without any type of warning, despite clear evidence of the fiber's dangers to workers and household members, a women tells Delaware's top court in urging it to reinstate her second-hand exposure case (Elizabeth Ramsey, et al. v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development Center, et al., No. 305, 2017, Del. Sup.).