LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Mealey's Labor & Employment - Judge Rejects Indiana's Challenge To ACA Employer Mandate

INDIANAPOLIS - Res judicata and U.S. Supreme Court precedent require judgment in favor of the federal government in a state's and school district's attack on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) employer mandate, a federal judge in Indiana held Feb. 14 (Indiana, et al. v. Internal Revenue Service, et al., NO. 13-1612, S.D. Ind., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24863).

Mealey's Health Law - Judge Rejects Indiana's Challenge To ACA Employer Mandate

INDIANAPOLIS - Res judicata and U.S. Supreme Court precedent require judgment in favor of the federal government in a state's and school district's attack on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) employer mandate, a federal judge in Indiana held Feb. 14 (Indiana, et al. v. Internal Revenue Service, et al., NO. 13-1612, S.D. Ind., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24863).

Mealey's Insurance - Judge Rejects Defunct ACA Insurer's Risk-Adjustment Program Challenge

BOSTON - A now-defunct Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurer's complaints about the law's risk-adjustment program seek impermissible retroactive rule making or fail to allege that the original rules were arbitrary or capricious, a federal judge in Massachusetts held Jan. 30 (Minuteman Health Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., No. 16-11570, D. Mass., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14727).

Mealey's Insurance - Federal Judge Again Allows Intervention Into ACA Contraceptive Mandate Suit

SAN FRANCISCO - An anti-abortion group has sufficient interests in the outcome of a suit challenging rules broadening the exemptions to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate to allow permissive intervention, a federal judge in California held Jan. 26 (California, et al. v. Don J. Wright, et al., No. 17-5783, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13290).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - EEOC Wants Federal Judge To Rethink Imposing Deadlines For ACA Rule Making

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge lacks the power to impose deadlines on a federal agency's rule-making process related to a Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) rule governing employee wellness program disclosures and discounts, the agency argues in a Jan. 16 brief filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AARP v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 16-2113, D. D.C.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - UnitedHealth, Insureds Battle Over Lactation Coverage Requirements In ACA

SAN FRANCISCO - Insureds create standards for lactation support services the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) does not impose in an attempt to save their suit, an insurance group told a California federal judge on Jan. 5 in support of its motion for summary judgment (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Insurance - UnitedHealth, Insureds Battle Over Lactation Coverage Requirements In ACA

SAN FRANCISCO - Insureds create standards for lactation support services the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) does not impose in an attempt to save their suit, an insurance group told a California federal judge on Jan. 5 in support of its motion for summary judgment (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Health Law - UnitedHealth, Insureds Battle Over Lactation Coverage Requirements In ACA

SAN FRANCISCO - Insureds create standards for lactation support services the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) does not impose in an attempt to save their suit, an insurance group told a California federal judge on Jan. 5 in support of its motion for summary judgment (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Insurance - California Federal Judge Allows Intervention Into Contraceptive Mandate Suit

SAN FRANCISCO - A religious order has sufficient interests in the outcome of a suit challenging rules broadening the exemptions to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate to permit intervention into the case, a federal judge in California held Dec. 29 (California, et al. v. Don J. Wright, et al., No. 17-5783, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213352).

Mealey's Health Law - California Federal Judge Allows Intervention Into Contraceptive Mandate Suit

SAN FRANCISCO - A religious order has sufficient interests in the outcome of a suit challenging rules broadening the exemptions to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate to permit intervention into the case, a federal judge in California held Dec. 29 (California, et al. v. Don J. Wright, et al., No. 17-5783, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213352).

Mealey's Insurance - California Federal Judge Halts New Contraceptive Mandate Exemptions

SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge in California enjoined new rules expanding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate, finding on Dec. 21 that the administration's sudden abandonment of previous policy and its failure to follow procedures provides strong grounds for the plaintiffs' case (State of California, et al. v. Don J. Wright, et al., No. 17-5783, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Insurance - Court To Divine If Catholic Group Intervenes In ACA Contraceptive Mandate Suit

SAN FRANCISCO - A religious group told a federal judge in California on Dec. 11 that it should be allowed to intervene in an action challenging new rules governing exemptions to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate, saying that while the states give lip service to protecting religious beliefs, the reality is much more stark (State of California, et al. v. Don J. Wright, et al., No. 17-5783, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Dave & Buster's $7.4M ERISA Settlement Denied By New York Federal Judge

NEW YORK - A New York federal judge, in an order filed Dec. 1, declined preliminary approval of a class settlement worth up to $7,425,000 offered by Dave & Buster's Inc. to end claims that the nationwide restaurant/entertainment chain violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the hours of its work force in 2013 to avoid the costs associated with providing health insurance to its full-time employees in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Maria De Lourdes Parra Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., et al., No. 15-3608, S.D. N.Y.).

Mealey's Health Law - Dave & Buster's $7.4M ERISA Settlement Denied By New York Federal Judge

NEW YORK - A New York federal judge, in an order filed Dec. 1, declined preliminary approval of a class settlement worth up to $7,425,000 offered by Dave & Buster's Inc. to end claims that the nationwide restaurant/entertainment chain violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the hours of its work force in 2013 to avoid the costs associated with providing health insurance to its full-time employees in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Maria De Lourdes Parra Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., et al., No. 15-3608, S.D. N.Y.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Judge Permits ACA, ERISA Claims Challenging Insurer's Lactation Services Coverage

CHICAGO - Three women may largely proceed with their class action claiming that their health insurance company erected insurmountable barriers rendering it impossible to procure in-network lactation services and imposed illegal cost-sharing on out-of-network services in violation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), a federal judge in Illinois held Dec. 4 (Laura Briscoe, et al. v. Health Care Service Corp., et al., No. 16-10294, N.D. Ill., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198452).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Dave & Buster's $7.4M ERISA Settlement Denied By New York Federal Judge

NEW YORK - A New York federal judge, in an order filed Dec. 1, declined preliminary approval of a class settlement worth up to $7,425,000 offered by Dave & Buster's Inc. to end claims that the nationwide restaurant/entertainment chain violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the hours of its work force in 2013 to avoid the costs associated with providing health insurance to its full-time employees in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Maria De Lourdes Parra Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., et al., No. 15-3608, S.D. N.Y.).

Mealey's PI/Product Liability - Pa.: ACA Birth-Control Mandate Exemptions Provide Injury, Standing For Suit

HARRISBURG, Pa. - New rules expanding moral and religious exemptions from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate threaten the health of Pennsylvania women and the commonwealth itself, the state argues in a Nov. 27 brief in support of a preliminary injunction barring the regulations (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., No. 17-4540, E.D. Pa.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Pa.: ACA Birth-Control Mandate Exemptions Provide Injury, Standing For Suit

HARRISBURG, Pa. - New rules expanding moral and religious exemptions from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive mandate threaten the health of Pennsylvania women and the commonwealth itself, the state argues in a Nov. 27 brief in support of a preliminary injunction barring the regulations (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., No. 17-4540, E.D. Pa.).

Mealey's Insurance - 8th Circuit Upholds Dismissal Of Dispute Seeking To Recover ACA Reinsurance Fee

ST. LOUIS - Finding sovereign immunity was not waived, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 27 affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by trustees of a self-insured group health plan seeking to recoup from the U.S. government a fee paid under the Affordable Care Act's transitional reinsurance program (Paul Batsche, et al. v. Thomas E. Price, No. 16-4305, 8th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 23844).

Mealey's Insurance - Judge Refuses To Reinstate ACA Cost-Sharing Payments To Insurers

SAN FRANCISCO - The Trump administration has the better legal argument in a case challenging the elimination of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments, and the relief sought by the plaintiff states would counterproductively harm their own residents, a federal judge in California said Oct. 25 in denying a preliminary injunction (The State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., No. 17-5895, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Health Law - ACA, UCL Claims Against Health Care Provider Survive In Transgender Case

SAN DIEGO - Allegations that an emergency health care provider touted its compassion toward those with gender dysphoria and then repeatedly referred to a transgender boy as female support his mother's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and California unfair competition law claims, a federal judge in California held Sept. 27 (Katharine Prescott, et al. v. Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego, No. 16-2408, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160259).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - ACA, UCL Claims Against Health Care Provider Survive In Transgender Case

SAN DIEGO - Allegations that an emergency health care provider touted its compassion toward those with gender dysphoria and then repeatedly referred to a transgender boy as female support his mother's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and California unfair competition law claims, a federal judge in California held Sept. 27 (Katharine Prescott, et al. v. Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego, No. 16-2408, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160259).

Mealey's Insurance - Insurer Files Answer, Wants Immediate Review Of ACA Lactation Coverage Ruling

SAN FRANCISCO - In a motion seeking interlocutory review, an insurer argues that whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires an insurer to provide access to lactation services or merely forbids financial barriers to obtaining such services is exactly the type of question the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals should address and, in an answer to the complaint filed Sept. 19 in a California federal court, the insurer says the plaintiffs' fail to state a claim under either the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the ACA on which relief can be based (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Health Law - Insurer Files Answer, Wants Immediate Review Of ACA Lactation Coverage Ruling

SAN FRANCISCO - In a motion seeking interlocutory review, an insurer argues that whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires an insurer to provide access to lactation services or merely forbids financial barriers to obtaining such services is exactly the type of question the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals should address and, in an answer to the complaint filed Sept. 19 in a California federal court, the insurer says the plaintiffs' fail to state a claim under either the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the ACA on which relief can be based (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Insurer Files Answer, Wants Immediate Review Of ACA Lactation Coverage Ruling

SAN FRANCISCO - In a motion seeking interlocutory review, an insurer argues that whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires an insurer to provide access to lactation services or merely forbids financial barriers to obtaining such services is exactly the type of question the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals should address and, in an answer to the complaint filed Sept. 19 in a California federal court, the insurer says the plaintiffs' fail to state a claim under either the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the ACA on which relief can be based (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).