WILMINGTON, Del. - A creditor in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of A123 Systems Inc. on Oct. 26 filed a brief in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware objecting to the debtor's plan to sell assets and entertain stalking horse bids (In Re: A123 Systems Inc., No. 12-12859, Chapter 11, D. Del. Bkcy.).
NEW ORLEANS - The court-appointed receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd (SIB) and related companies may stand in the shoes of creditors in seeking to recover nearly $1.6 million in political contributions made to a number of political committees by the Stanford defendants, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Oct. 23 (Ralph S. Janvey, as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Ltd., et al., No. 11-10704, 5th Cir.; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22058).
ATLANTA - A bank waived its right to compel arbitration when it decided to decline two invitations by a Florida federal court to move to compel arbitration in five putative class suits brought by the bank's customers, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Oct. 26 (Melanie Garcia, et al. v. Wachovia Corporation, et al., No. 11-16029, 11th Cir.). View related prior history, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145034.
LAS VEGAS - Family Dollar Inc. is not the "operator" of an ATM as defined by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), 15 U.S.C.S. § 1601, a federal judge in Nevada ruled Oct. 25, granting Family Dollar's motion for summary judgment in a putative class action alleging that Family Dollar violated the statute because there were no written fee notices on the ATM in question (Thomas Chayra v. Family Dollar Inc., No. 11-01710, D. Nev.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153337).
NEW YORK - The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 23 ruled that it will not reconsider its decision that a consumer who alleged that a New York City provider of electricity-generating capacity violated antitrust laws by engaging in a swap transaction lacks antitrust standing because he was an indirect purchaser and that his claims are otherwise barred by the filed-rate doctrine (Charles Simon v. KeySpan Corporation, et al., No. 11-2265, 2nd Cir.). View related prior history, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19815.
TACOMA, Wash. - A federal judge in Washington on Oct. 24 dismissed with prejudice a suit in which a borrower asserts breach of contract, predatory lending and other claims against Union Bank N.A., which acquired his loans from Frontier Bank after Frontier Bank's failure, because the agreements on which the borrower bases his claims are not in writing (Robert Kanany v. Union Bank N.A., No.11-06062, W.D. Wash.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152941).
Federal judges in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on Oct. 23 divided over whether to grant pharmaceutical manufacturers' motions to stay cases involving reverse-payment settlements between holders of a drug patent and generic manufacturers of the those drugs pending the U.S. Supreme Court's deciding whether it will hear an appeal of a similar case (In re Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation, Nos. 11-5479, 11-5661, 11-7504, 11-6985, 11-3523, 11-3116, 11-5590, D. N.J.; In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 12-995, D. N.J.; In re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2332, D. N.J.).
MINNEAPOLIS - A federal judge in Minnesota on Oct. 25 granted a pension fund's motion for class certification in a securities class action against a medical device maker and certain of its executive officers, ruling that the pension fund has properly met all statutory requirements for establishing the class (In re St. Jude Medical Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 10-0851, D. Minn.). Subscribers may view the order available within the full article.
NEW YORK - A company argues in an Oct. 25 filing in a New York federal court that a shareholder derivative lawsuit brought against its directors and officers should be dismissed because the shareholders failed to show that presuit demand upon the company's board would have been futile (In re SAIC Inc. Derivative Litigation, No. 12-cv-02437, S.D. N.Y.).
NEW ORLEANS - The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 22 affirmed the dismissal of a Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C.S. § 1681, (FCRA) complaint, disagreeing with a consumer's argument that he properly alleged that a collection agency violated the statute by obtaining his credit report without his permission or a permissible purpose (Wayne Norman v. Northland Group Inc., No. 12-10057, 5th Cir.; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21987).
SAN FRANCISCO - A gas station's California unfair competition law (UCL), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, action against a fuel nozzle company requires individualized inquiry into who saw representations, as well as who made them, a federal judge held Oct. 22 in denying class certification (Castro Valley Union 76 Inc. v. Vapor Systems Technologies Inc., No. 11-299, N.D. Calif.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151734).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge in Washington on Oct. 24 denied the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s request to compel JPMorgan Chase Bank (Chase) to produce privileged documents in Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.'s $10 billion suit alleging that Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) issued shoddy mortgages before it failed, citing attorney-client privilege (Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., et al., 09-01656, D. D.C.) Subscribers may view the order available within the full Mealey's article.
MINNEAPOLIS - A Minnesota couple's failure to sufficiently plead that they were harmed as a result of a BAC Home Loans Servicing LP representative's statement that a sheriff's sale on their home had been postponed pending a loan modification request was fatal to their lawsuit against Bank of America N.A. and its loan-servicing arm, a federal judge ruled Oct. 24 (Margaret E. Stumm, et al. v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, et al., No. 11-3736, D. Minn.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152728).
SAN FRANCISCO - A homeowner's default on his mortgage, not any procedural errors in naming an authorized agent or the filing of default and foreclosure documents, caused his injury, a federal judge held Oct. 22 in dismissing California unfair competition law (UCL) Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, claims (John P. McGough v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al., No. 12-50, N.D. Calif.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151737).
NEW YORK - Former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. director Rajat Gupta will serve two years in prison, followed by a year of supervised release, a federal judge in New York ruled Oct. 24 in sentencing Gupta for his role in an insider-trading scheme (United States of America v. Rajat Gupta, No. 11-cr-0907, S.D. N.Y.). Subscribers may view the sentencing memorandum and order available within the full article.
WILMINGTON, Del. - A Delaware vice chancellor on Oct. 23 approved the settlement of a shareholder suit against a company and its directors and officers that was accomplished through certain supplemental disclosures regarding the sale of the company (Ronald M. Mitkowski, et al., v. Baldwin Technology Company, Inc., et al., No. 7157-VCN, Del. Chanc.).
NEW YORK - The U.S. government on Oct. 24 filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Bank of America Corp., as successor for Countrywide Financial Corp., alleging that Countrywide violated provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.S. § 3729-3733 by engaging in a scheme to defraud Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in connection with Countrywide's residential mortgage lending business (United States of America v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 12-1422, S.D. N.Y.).
Follow this link to view a complimentary copy of the complete Mealey's article.
NEW YORK - A federal judge in New York on Oct. 23 granted final approval to a $10.5 million settlement between direct and indirect purchasers and Aland (Jiangsu) Nutraceutical Co. Ltd., a Chinese manufacturer of vitamin C, on claims that the manufacturer participated in an illegal cartel with other Chinese corporations to fix prices and limit supply for exports of vitamin C, including those to the United States (In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation [All Cases], No. 06-MC-1738, E.D. N.Y.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152275).
MINNEAPOLIS - A federal judge in Minnesota on Oct. 22 granted in part shareholders' motion to alter or amend an earlier ruling dismissing a consolidated shareholder class action complaint, ruling that his dismissal of the complaint with prejudice was premature (IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund, et al. v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al., No. 11-429, D. Minn.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151327).
NEW YORK - In an opinion made available on Oct. 22, a New York state court justice substantially denied motions to dismiss in a securities lawsuit against Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GSG) and certain of its subsidiaries, ruling that an investor has properly pleaded a majority of its claims (Basis Yield Alpha Fund (Master) v. Goldman Sachs Group Inc., et al., No. 652996/2011, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.; 2012 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4960).
DETROIT - A federal judge in Michigan on Oct. 22 dismissed a man's lawsuit challenging the foreclosure on his home, rejecting his claim that the assignment of his mortgage loan to trustee Bank of New York Mellon, formerly known as the Bank of New York (BNY Mellon), wrongfully split the mortgage from the promissory note (Jermaine Martin v. Gateway Funding Diversified Mortgage Services L.P., et al., No. 12-11764, E.D. Mich.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151207).
TAMPA, Fla. - A shareholder has properly shown that a company's directors breached their fiduciary duty by their actions during a merger deal, a federal judge in Florida ruled Oct. 22 in granting in part and denying in part the defendants' motion to dismiss (Alan Gault v. SRI Surgical Express Inc., et al., No. 12-1389, M.D. Fla.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151409).
CINCINNATI - A federal judge in Ohio on Oct. 23 granted a company's directors' and officers' motion to dismiss a shareholder derivative suit, holding that the shareholder failed to show why presuit demand upon the board would have been futile because the shareholder could not prove that the directors were aware of certain improprieties (Henry Stanley, derivatively on behalf of Cardinal Health, Inc, v. Colleen F. Arnold, et al., No. 12-cv-00482, S.D. Ohio). Subscribers may view the order available within the full article.
DAYTON, Ohio - A corporation and its directors and officers said in an Ohio federal court on Oct. 22 that a shareholder's class action suit fails because the complaint regarding the sale of the company should have been brought derivatively on behalf of the corporation (J. Robert Smith, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Robins & Myers, Inc., et al., No. 12-cv-00281, S.D. Ohio). Subscribers may view the brief available within the full article.
CHICAGO - FirstMerit Bank NA, as the successor to the failed Midwest Bank and Trust Co., is entitled to payments from people who breached their personal guarantees on a commercial loan, a federal judge in Illinois ruled Oct. 22 (FirstMerit Bank, NA v. Albert L. Grasso, et al., No. 11-08986, N.D. Ill.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151211).