SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on May 22 granted final approval of a $1.75 million settlement to be paid by Coach Inc. and Coach Services Inc. (collectively, Coach) to end multiple class wage-and-hour claims, including one brought under California's unfair competition law (UCL) (Mary Lou Ayala, et al. v. Coach, Inc., et al., No. 14-2031, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77652).
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on May 22 dismissed an investor's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and securities laws, finding that he failed to show that he was fraudulently induced into investing in the development of a nightclub (Matthias Mueller v. San Diego Entertainment Partners LLC, et al., No. 16cv2997, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77643).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A California federal jury's finding in May 2016 that Google Inc.'s incorporation of the Java structure, sequence and organization (SSO) in its Android operating system was a fair use was proper and should not be disturbed, Google told the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 22 (Oracle America Inc. v. Google Inc., Nos. 17-1118, -1202, Fed. Cir.).
OAKLAND, Calif. - San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) was hit with a putative class complaint in California federal court May 22, with one of its mass transit passengers claiming that the organization's smartphone application surreptitiously collects the International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) numbers associated with users' phones, as well as their precise locations, in violation of state and federal law (Pamela Moreno v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, et al., No. 4:17-cv-02911, N.D. Calif.).
LOS ANGELES - A trademark and copyright dispute over the phrase "Life is Beautiful" rejected on summary judgment due to a lack of similarity and a plaintiff's unclean hands yielded a $922,309 attorney fee award on May 23 by a California federal judge (Amusement Art LLC v. Life is Beautiful LLC, et al., No. 14-8290, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79135).
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on May 23 granted an insurer's motion for summary judgment on the remaining claims in a production company insured's lawsuit seeking coverage for damages caused by a train accident that killed a camera technician and injured the film's director and several crew members (Film Allman LLC v. New York Marine and General Insurance Co., Inc., No 14-7069, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79139).
LOS ANGELES - A dispute between competing car clubs over the "Stylistics" trademark was resolved in favor of a plaintiff on May 23, when a California federal judge awarded summary judgment (Gilbert Lerma Jr. v. Ernie Armijo, et al., No. 15-9953, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77575).
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal magistrate judge properly found that Google Inc. could be subpoenaed to provide foreign-stored user data under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), the U.S. government says in a May 19 brief opposing Google's motion for de novo review of the magistrate's ruling (In the Matter of the Search of Content That is Stored at Premises Controlled by Google, No. 3:16-mc-80263, N.D. Calif.).
FRESNO, Calif. - A California federal judge on May 23 granted summary judgment in a Smith & Nephew Inc. knee case, saying that the plaintiff failed to present much evidence to support his claims and that his rebuttals fell short (Ruben B. Merancio, et al. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., No. 15-807, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78352).
NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on May 18 denied a motion to dismiss and granted a motion to transfer New York state overtime claims filed by pet store assistant managers to a California federal court where another case is pending alleging overtime claims under federal law (Deserie Michel, et al. v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc., et al., No. 16-1838, E.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75892).
FRESNO, Calif. - A California federal judge on May 19 granted final approval of a $4.5 million settlement to be paid by a food production company to end current and former employees' claims that they were denied pay for certain activities, including donning and doffing (Luis Aguilar, et al. v. Wawona Frozen Foods, et al., No. 15-93, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76751).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A consolidated class action over three announced data breach incidents fails for lack of standing because the plaintiffs have not alleged any resulting injury or damages, Yahoo Inc. says in a May 22 motion in California federal court, seeking dismissal for lack of standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Const. art. 3 (In re: Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 5:16-md-02752, N.D. Calif.).
FRESNO, Calif. - A California federal judge on May 18 denied a borrower's motion to amend her complaint in which she alleges that a bank violated California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws related to a wrongful foreclosure, finding that she failed to allege any facts that would support new claims (Brenda D. Dowling v. Bank of America, et al., No. 1:14-cv-01041, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76063).
LOS ANGELES - The Second District California Court of Appeal on May 18 reversed a trial court's judgment in favor of an insured in a silica coverage case after determining that the insured released its right to assert any bad faith claims against the insurer and after finding that the insurer has no further duty to defend the insured because the insurer's policy limits were exhausted in 2013 (Truck Insurance Exchange v. Moldex Metric Inc., et al., No. B272378, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3485).
SAN FRANCISCO - In granting in part and denying in part a motion to dismiss, a federal judge in California on May 17 held that a pension fund has cured its pleading deficiencies and properly shown that a semiconductor producer and its CEO acted with the requisite scienter in misrepresenting the company's key business metrics as required under federal securities laws (Daniel Luna v. Marvell Technology Group Ltd., et al., No. 15-5447, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75262).
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on May 17 partially granted a mortgage company's motion to dismiss claims including violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), allowing part of a borrower's dual tracking claim to proceed and dismissing the remainder of the claims with leave to amend (Gilbert Chavez v. CitiMortgage Inc., No. 17-cv-01205, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75430).