SAN FRANCISCO - The California Supreme Court on Feb. 8 reversed an appeals court finding that a district attorney's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and false advertising law asserted against a plastics maker in relation to an explosion that killed two employees were not preempted by federal occupational safety and health law, finding that those claims remain within a state's responsibility under federal law to regulate worker safety (Solus Industrial Innovations LLC, et al. v. The Superior Court of Orange County, et al., No. S222314, Calif. Sup., 2018 Cal. LEXIS 934).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on Feb. 6 refused to dismiss claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other causes of action asserted by consumers against The Clorox Co., finding that the company's "naturally derived" labeling could have deceived them into purchasing the products (Joseph Gregorio, et al. v. The Clorox Company, No. 17-cv-03824, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19542).
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Feb. 6 denied a motion to transfer a disability claimant's suit to Pennsylvania federal court because the defendants failed to prove that transferring the suit would serve the convenience of the parties and would promote the interests of justice (Stephanie Stefan v. Life Insurance Company of North America, et al., No. 17-6165, C.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20356).
SAN FRANCISCO - In a pair of Feb. 7 reply briefs, a man found guilty of federal computer fraud and trade secret misappropriation charges asks a California federal court to grant him a writ of coram nobis to reconsider his prison sentence, in light of subsequent trade secret theft carried out by his former employer, which was his purported victim (United States v. David Nosal, No. 3:08-cr-00237, N.D. Calif.).
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - The city of Davis, Calif., was cleared of liability from a couple's request for contribution and cost recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) by a federal judge in California on Feb. 6 after the couple failed to respond to the city's motion for summary judgment (Charles H. Lewis, et al. v. Robert D. Russell, et al., No. 03-2646, E.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19532).
SAN FRANCISCO - Waymo LLC and Uber Technologies Inc. on Feb. 9 agreed to settle their trade secrets misappropriation lawsuit, five days after the case went to trial on claims that a former Waymo employee stole the company's trade secret information and provided it to Uber in violation of state and federal trade secrets law, according to federal judge in California's order granting the parties' stipulation of dismissal (Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc., et al., No. 17-0939, N.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO - In the wake of at least 50 federal patent infringement lawsuits filed against its cloud-computing customers, Amazon.com Inc. on Feb. 5 sued the plaintiff in those suits in California federal court, seeking declarations of noninfringement and claim preclusion due to a previous judgment it obtained against the technology firm (Amazon.com Inc., et al. v. PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al., No. 3:18-cv-00767, N.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO - A claim for pension disability benefits was properly denied because the disability claimant failed to submit medical records detailing his disability as requested on multiple occasions by the plan at issue, a California federal judge said Feb. 6 (Vanmark Strickland v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan, No. 17-01393, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19566).
LOS ANGELES - A customer on Feb. 2 sued Spirit Airlines Inc. in a California federal court, alleging that it violated California's unfair competition law (UCL) and engaged in false advertising by misrepresenting that its products are the least expensive available (Nikki Giavasis v. Spirit Airlines, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-864, C.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Feb. 6 granted an online marketplace host's motion to dismiss counterclaims asserted against it for violation of California's unfair competition law, breach of contract, fraud and other claims asserted by a user of the marketplace who allegedly failed to pay for or return inventory from the website, but granted the user leave to amend the claims to assert more specific factual allegations (Ouiby Inc. v. Idil Doguoglu Posey, et al., No. 17-cv-03847, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19502).
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge properly granted a defendant summary judgment on allegations that a pen and ink depiction of two dolphins crossing underwater was infringed, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Feb. 2 (Peter A. Folkens v. Wyland Worldwide LLC, et al., No. 16-15882, 9th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2768).
LOS ANGELES - A California court on Feb. 1 affirmed a trial court's dismissal of a purchaser's class action claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and another California law against a solar energy products company, finding that the company was not required to be a licensed contractor to complete its installations (Shawn Reed v. Sunrun Inc., No. B276862, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 2, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 743).
FRESNO, Calif. - A federal judge in California on Feb. 2 denied a landowner's motion to enforce a settlement agreement with a city accused of contributing to perchloroethylene (PCE) contamination, finding that the city must first resolve a dispute with its insurance carriers to obtain coverage (Gary Coppola, et al. v. Gregory Smith, et al., No. 11-CV-1257 AWI BAM, E.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17769).
SAN FRANCISCO - A shareholder was appointed lead plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit against high-performance electric vehicles manufacturer Tesla Inc. and certain of its current and former executive officers, and his choice of counsel was appointed as lead counsel on Feb. 2 after a federal judge in California ruled that both the shareholder and lead counsel met all requirements to serve in their roles (Gregory Wachos v. Tesla Inc., et al., No. 17-5828, N.D. Calif.).
SAN FRANCISCO - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 1 affirmed a district court's decision in favor of a bank on a borrower's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims, but reversed the ruling on her claim for violation of the Consumer Credit Reporting Act (CCRA), finding that a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the bank's alleged misreporting of her credit information caused her to suffer damages and whether the bank had reasonable measures in place to ensure that incorrect information was not transmitted (Nahid Noori v. Bank of America N.A., No. 16-56082, 9th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2575).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A judge in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on Jan. 31 dismissed an inverse condemnation lawsuit against the federal government concerning drinking water that was contaminated with hexavalent chromium from McClellan Air Force Base on grounds that the case was filed prematurely (Rio Linda Elverta Community Water District v. United States of America, No. 17-859 C, Fed. Clms.; 2018 U.S. Claims LEXIS 47).
SAN FRANCISCO - De novo review applies to an insurer's denial of coverage for mental health treatments under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act because the California Insurance Code treats health insurance as a form of disability insurance and bars discretionary clauses, a federal judge in the state held Jan. 31 (Mahlon D., et al. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co., No. 16-7230, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16332).
PHILADELPHIA - In a consolidated class action against a life insurer for breaches of its policies through consideration of lower investment income and higher reinsurance costs, a Pennsylvania federal judge on Feb. 1 allowed the class to amend its complaint to add a tortious breach of good faith and fair dealing claim on behalf of a California sub-class (In re: Lincoln National Co. Litigation, No. 16-06605, E.D. Pa., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16355).
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that a former property owner's claim that a lender interfered with his private sale of a property by recording a notice of trustee's sale failed, a California federal judge on Jan. 30 dismissed his claim for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) for failure to state a claim (Moshen Khaziri v. Caliber Home Loans Inc., No. 17-cv-01639, N.D. Calif., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16308).