LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Mealey's Litigation Procedure - California Federal Judge Sends Consolidated Wal-Mart Wage Suit Back To State Court

LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Sept. 19 granted a motion requesting remand of a consolidated class complaint accusing Wal-Mart Stores Inc. of various wage violations, finding that Wal-Mart failed to show that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million and filed an untimely removal (Polo Garcia, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., No. 15-5337, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127476).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Vizio Moves To Dismiss Smart TV Privacy Suit For Lack Of Standing

SANTA ANA, Calif. - Vizio Inc. on Sept. 19 moved to dismiss a putative class action in California federal court over purported tracking of smart TV users' "viewing data" for lack of standing, arguing that the plaintiffs did not establish that it is a "video tape service provider" under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) or that it disclosed their personally identifiable information (PII) (In Re: Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, No. 8:16-ml-02693, C.D. Calif.).

Mealey's IP/Tech - California Federal Judge Agrees: 3 Claims Of 2 Patents Fail Section 101

SAN FRANCISCO - Amazon.com Inc. on Sept. 20 won dismissal with prejudice of allegations that it infringed two patents amid findings by a California federal judge that the patents in suit do not pass muster under 35 U.S. Code Section 101 (TriDim Innovations LLC v. Amazon.com Inc., No. 15-5477, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127483).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - Judge Strikes Majority Of Defenses To Claims Related To Unlawful Broadcast

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A California federal judge on Sept. 16 partially granted a sports promotion company's motion to strike affirmative defenses to its claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and conversion, but refused to strike a defense in relation to standing to sue (Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Willie Henry Williams, a/k/a William Henry, et al., No. 2:14-cv-02663, E.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127513).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Class Certified In Suits Alleging Denial Of Mental Health, Abuse Treatment

SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Sept. 19 certified a class of insureds accusing their health insurance provider of wrongly denying coverage of mental health and substance abuse treatment to thousands and claiming that the provider is an ERISA fiduciary under 29 U.S. Code Section 1104(a) "and therefore owes a duty to discharge its duties 'with . . . care, skill, prudence, and diligence' and 'solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries'" (David Wit, et al. v. United Behavioral Health, No. 14-2346, Gary Alexander, et al. v. United Behavioral Health, No. 14-5337, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127435).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Pelvic Mesh Defendant Has Negative Worth, Class Settlement Parties Tell Judge

LOS ANGELES - Parties to a proposed $12.25 million limited-fund, mandatory class settlement for pelvic mesh injury claims against Caldera Medical Inc. on Sept. 19 told a California federal judge that after a court-ordered analysis of the company's liquidation value, it has a negative liquidation value and can contribute nothing more to the settlement (Federal Insurance Company v. Caldera Medical, Inc., et al., No. 15-393, C.D. Calif.).

Mealey's PI/Product Liability - Pelvic Mesh Defendant Has Negative Worth, Class Settlement Parties Tell Judge

LOS ANGELES - Parties to a proposed $12.25 million limited-fund, mandatory class settlement for pelvic mesh injury claims against Caldera Medical Inc. on Sept. 19 told a California federal judge that after a court-ordered analysis of the company's liquidation value, it has a negative liquidation value and can contribute nothing more to the settlement (Federal Insurance Company v. Caldera Medical, Inc., et al., No. 15-393, C.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Judge Stays Class Against KIND Pending FDA Ruling On Term 'Natural'

NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on Sept. 15 stayed claims asserted by consumers for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), negligent misrepresentation and other causes of action asserted against a seller of snack foods pending the outcome of a decision by the Food and Drug Administration on the use of the word "natural" on product labels (In re: Kind LLC "Health and All Natural" Litigation, Nos. 15-MD-2645 [WHP],15-MC-2645 [WHP], S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125752).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - Federal Judge Remands Borrower's Foreclosure Claims To State Court

RIVERSIDE, Calif. - In an unpublished opinion, a California federal judge on Sept. 14 remanded claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and wrongful foreclosure to state court, finding that a borrower failed to show that diversity jurisdiction existed because both the borrower and a law firm named as defendant were citizens of California (Jin Ju Sung v. Bank of America, N.A., et al., No. 16-1797, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125198).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - Judge Stays Class Against KIND Pending FDA Ruling On Term 'Natural'

NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on Sept. 15 stayed claims asserted by consumers for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), negligent misrepresentation and other causes of action asserted against a seller of snack foods pending the outcome of a decision by the Food and Drug Administration on the use of the word "natural" on product labels (In re: Kind LLC "Health and All Natural" Litigation, Nos. 15-MD-2645 [WHP],15-MC-2645 [WHP], S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125752).

Mealey's PI/Product Liability - Blood Clot Timing Device Class Action Dismissed With Leave To Amend

SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on Sept. 13 dismissed a class action involving a recalled device that measures patients' blood clotting times, but gave the plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint (Dina Andren, et al. v. Alere, Inc., et al., No. 16-1255, S.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124252).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Federal Judge Remands Claims By Sleep Centers For Payment To State Court

LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Sept. 12 granted a request to remand claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims asserted by operators of sleep centers in relation to allegedly unpaid medical care by insurers, finding that the district court lacked federal jurisdiction (Northern Va. Operating Co. LLC, et al. v. CIGNA Healthcare of Ca. Inc., et al., No. 16-5168, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124291).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - Judge Says Purchaser Lacks Standing To Bring Claims Related To Mulch

FRESNO, Calif. - A California federal judge on Sept. 14 granted a motion filed by a producer of mulch that was sold by Lowes Home Centers LLC to dismiss claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other California law claims in relation to the amount of mulch that is in the bags, finding that a purchaser lacked standing (Glenn McMillan v. Lowes Home Centers LLC, et al., No. 1:15-cv-00695, E.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125162).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - Federal Judge Remands Claims By Sleep Centers For Payment To State Court

LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Sept. 12 granted a request to remand claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims asserted by operators of sleep centers in relation to allegedly unpaid medical care by insurers, finding that the district court lacked federal jurisdiction (Northern Va. Operating Co. LLC, et al. v. CIGNA Healthcare of Ca. Inc., et al., No. 16-5168, C.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124291).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - IPhone User Sues Apple For Failure To Honor Phone Upgrade Program

SAN JOSE, Calif. - In a putative class complaint filed Sept. 12 in California federal court, a New York man alleges breach of contract and unfair competition against Apple Inc. for its purported failure to live up to its pledge to annually furnish the latest models of iPhones to members of its "iPhone Upgrade Program" (Emil Frank v. Apple Inc., No. 5:16-cv-05217, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - IPhone User Sues Apple For Failure To Honor Phone Upgrade Program

SAN JOSE, Calif. - In a putative class complaint filed Sept. 12 in California federal court, a New York man alleges breach of contract and unfair competition against Apple Inc. for its purported failure to live up to its pledge to annually furnish the latest models of iPhones to members of its "iPhone Upgrade Program" (Emil Frank v. Apple Inc., No. 5:16-cv-05217, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Massachusetts Federal Judge Transfers Cleaning Franchisees' Claims To California Federal Court

BOSTON - A Massachusetts federal judge on Sept. 13 granted three California plaintiffs' motion to sever and transfer their class action claims against a cleaning franchisor to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, saying that California has a greater interest in this case and that all claims brought by Massachusetts plaintiffs have been dismissed (Giovani Depianti, et al. v. Jan-Pro Franchising Inc., No. 08-10663, D. Mass.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124106).

Mealey's IP/Tech - IPhone User Sues Apple For Failure To Honor Phone Upgrade Program

SAN JOSE, Calif. - In a putative class complaint filed Sept. 12 in California federal court, a New York man alleges breach of contract and unfair competition against Apple Inc. for its purported failure to live up to its pledge to annually furnish the latest models of iPhones to members of its "iPhone Upgrade Program" (Emil Frank v. Apple Inc., No. 5:16-cv-05217, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Massachusetts Federal Judge Transfers Cleaning Franchisees' Claims To California Federal Court

BOSTON - A Massachusetts federal judge on Sept. 13 granted three California plaintiffs' motion to sever and transfer their class action claims against a cleaning franchisor to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, saying that California has a greater interest in this case and that all claims brought by Massachusetts plaintiffs have been dismissed (Giovani Depianti, et al. v. Jan-Pro Franchising Inc., No. 08-10663, D. Mass.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124106).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Warranty Breach Claims Proceed In Suit Alleging Squid In Octopus Products

SAN JOSE, Calif. - A consumer who has accused Goya Foods Inc. of using squid in its products labeled as octopus may proceed with his breach of warranty claims, a California federal judge ruled Sept. 8, granting in part and denying in part a dismissal motion (Luis Diego Zapata Fonseca v. Goya Foods Inc., No. 16-2559, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121716).

Mealey's Antitrust/Unfair Competition - Judge Finds Medical Supplier Lacks Standing To Assert California Law Claims

OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on Sept. 8 found that an orthopedic medical products supplier lacked standing to assert claims for violation of California law, granting a motion filed by another medical supplier to dismiss the case (Golden State Orthopaedics Inc. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics, No. 14-cv-3073, N.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121710).

Mealey's Insurance - Federal Judge Vacates Hearing On Insurer's Motion To Stay Rescission Dispute

SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Sept. 8 vacated a Sept. 22 hearing on an insurer's motion to stay and for permission to appeal the issue of whether concealment in an insurance policy rescission lawsuit is measured under California law when the insurance policy is formed or when the policy is delivered to the insured (Illinois Union Insurance Co., et al. v. Intuitive Surgical Inc., No. 13-04863, N.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Judge: Deletion Of Secretly Recorded Conversations Does Not Merit Sanctions

SANTA ANA, Calif. - Finding no evidence that a University of California (UC) police chief was on notice of potential litigation related to the surreptitious recording of officers' private conversations, a California federal judge on Sept. 8 denied a plaintiff officer's motion seeking sanctions for what he said was spoliation of essential evidence in the deletion of those recordings (Federated University Police Officers' Association, et al. v. The Regents of the University of California, et al., No. 8:15-cv-00137, C.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Judge: Deletion Of Secretly Recorded Conversations Does Not Merit Sanctions

SANTA ANA, Calif. - Finding no evidence that a University of California (UC) police chief was on notice of potential litigation related to the surreptitious recording of officers' private conversations, a California federal judge on Sept. 8 denied a plaintiff officer's motion seeking sanctions for what he said was spoliation of essential evidence in the deletion of those recordings (Federated University Police Officers' Association, et al. v. The Regents of the University of California, et al., No. 8:15-cv-00137, C.D. Calif.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - 9th Circuit: Court Lacked Authority To Decide Uber's Arbitration Enforceability

SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal court had no authority to rule on the enforceability of arbitration agreements entered into between Uber Technologies Inc. and its drivers except as to a representative claim under California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Sept. 7 (Abdul Kadir Mohamed, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Nos. 15-16178 and 15-16250, Ronald Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-16181, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16413).