WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 27 declined to review lower court rulings that the consolidation of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter cases for individual bellwether trials does not convert the cases into a mass action under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), (Cordis Corporation v. Jerry Dunson, et al., No. 17-257, U.S. Sup.).
SAN DIEGO - After a borrower failed to respond to motions filed by lenders and loan servicers to dismiss claims related to an alleged wrongful foreclosure, a California federal judge on Nov. 20 dismissed his claims for violation of California's unfair competition law, negligence and other claims (Mark Burchard v. Quality Loan Service Corporation, et al., No. 17cv1780, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191737).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal bankruptcy judge on Nov. 16 entered a judgment of more than $3.5 million against an insurance company in a dispute over the amount of coverage owed to a company's liquidating trust for asbestos personal injury claims, including attorney fees and a $60,000 penalty for the insurer's "vexatious and unreasonable conduct" in the case (In re CFB Liquidating Corporation, f/k/a Chicago Fire Brick Co., et al., No. 01-45483, [Barry A. Chatz, as Trustee for the CFB/WFB Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Company, No. 15-4136] N.D. Calif. Bkcy., 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 3938).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A judgment of patent invalidity based upon findings that certain language in a patented catalytic conversion system is indefinite was reversed Nov. 20 by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc., No. 16-1770, Fed. Cir.).
FORT WAYNE, Ind. - A federal judge in Indiana on Nov. 16 ruled that a group of plaintiffs asserting claims of personal injury from exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl chloride, benzene and other chemicals is not entitled to class certification (Opal Millman v. United Technologies Corporation, et al., No. 16-312, N.D. Ind.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189638).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a reversal of its previous findings, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 13 upheld a Wisconsin federal judge's decision to deny a new trial on damages and infringement of various genetic testing kit patents (Promega Corporation v. Life Technologies Corp., No. 13-1011, Fed. Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22635).
RICHMOND, Va. - An employer acted within its rights and did not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act when it amended a deferred compensation plan's applicable crediting rate, affecting all, even retired, plan participants, a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Nov. 8 (Jeffrey Plotnick, et al. v. Computer Sciences Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Executives, et al., No. 16-1606, 4th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22500).
WILMINGTON, Del. - Allegations that Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. directly infringed various method claims of two patents by providing installation guides and videos on its website for accused luxury vinyl tile and wood plastic composite flooring products should be dismissed, a Delaware federal magistrate judge ruled Nov. 9 (Valinge Innovation AB v. Halstead New England Corporation, et al., No. 16-1082, D. Del., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185826).
SANTA ANA, Calif. - A California appeals panel on Nov. 6 affirmed a lower court's finding that commercial general liability insurers have no duty to defend pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors against two underling lawsuits alleging that they engaged in a fraudulent scheme to promote the use of opioids for long-term pain to increase corporate profits, finding that the underlying actions can be read only as being based on the insureds' deliberate and intentional conduct that produced injuries that were neither unexpected nor unforeseen (The Traveler's Property Casualty Company of America, et al. v. Actavis Inc., et al., No. G053749, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 3, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 976).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) on Nov. 6 announced that a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits will soon be held in a dispute over an investment in a telecommunications enterprise between a corporation and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay (Itabla Corp. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, No. ARB/16/9, ICSID).
BATON ROUGE, La. - A federal magistrate judge in Louisiana on Nov. 3 denied Louisiana Generating LLC's motion for a more definite statement, finding that two nonprofit energy cooperative corporations sufficiently stated claims that the defendant company may have violated power supply and service agreements by charging them for costs associated with the remediation of environmental conditions at the Big Cajun II generating plant (Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al. v. Louisiana Generating, LLC, No. 17-405-JJB-RLB, M.D. La., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182387).
CINCINNATI - A pet food maker incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Tennessee failed to demonstrate minimal diversity required under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) in a class complaint brought on behalf of a Tennessee class, an Ohio federal judge ruled Nov. 2, opining that nothing in CAFA changes the rule established in 28 U.S. Code Section 1332(c)(1) that a corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation and its principal place of business (Randy Roberts v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., No. 17-6122, 6th Cir., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21926).
NEW YORK - A New York federal judge did not err in determining, following a bench trial, that a declaratory judgment plaintiff's bag closure products do not infringe or dilute a competitor's trade dress, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded Nov. 2 (Schutte Bagclosures Inc. and Schutte Bagclosures B.V. v. Kiwk Lok Corporation, No. 16-2767, 2nd Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21864).
PASADENA, Calif. - A Federal Express Corp. (FedEx) pilot, who served in the reserves, is owed the signing bonus he would have earned in a new position had his training not been delayed due to being called up for active duty, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Nov. 2, affirming a trial court judge's ruling (Dale Huhmann v. Federal Express Corporation, No. 15-56744, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21955).
TRENTON, N.J. - A federal judge in New Jersey on Nov. 1 denied ExxonMobil Corp.'s and ExxonMobil Oil Corp.'s motion for partial summary judgment regarding damages associated with remediation costs pertaining to groundwater contamination caused by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), concluding that the defendants' proposed alternative burden for determining proper remediation was "not supported by good cause" (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corporation, No. 15-6468, D. N.J.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180986).
TORONTO - The Ontario Court of Appeals on Oct. 31 found that in the interests of justice, a group of Ecuadorian claimants, who are attempting to enforce a $9.5 billion environmental damage ruling in their favor, should not be required to post security costs and denied a request by Chevron Corp. and its subsidiary seeking costs (Yaiguaje v. Chevron Corporation, No. 2017 ONCA 827, Ontario App.).
LOS ANGELES - In an unpublished opinion issued Oct. 31, a California appellate panel affirmed a defense verdict in favor of Target Corp. in a premises liability suit because the woman who cut herself on a price sign failed to file the complete record with her appeal (Mahnaz Sadanian v. Target Corporation, No. B268653, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 8, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7467).
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina - A judge in Argentina on Oct. 31 rejected and refused to recognize a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron Corp. for remediation damages, which was handed down in an Ecuadorian court in a case brought by an attorney representing a group of residents who contend that the company injured them while conducting oil operations in the Lago Agrio region of Ecuador (Aguinda Salazar Maria, et al. v. Chevron Corporation, No. 97260/2012, Nat. Civ. Ct. No. 61, Buenos Aires, Argentina).
ALEXANDRIA, Va. - Three petitioners, including Canon Inc., took aim on Oct. 31 at a patented video surveillance system that extracts "primitives" from a video, in a new petition for inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Axis Communications AB, et al., v. Avigilon Fortress Corporation, No. IPR2018-00138, PTAB).
ATLANTA - A Georgia appeals panel on Oct. 31 reversed a trial judge's ruling that the predecessors of a company that sold a contaminated site to U.S. Steel Corp. in 1968 should be required to provide indemnification for remediation costs that resulted from U.S. Steel's negligence, finding that the terms of the agreement do not hold the seller liable for environmental damages that took place after the sale (Viad Corp. v. United States Steel Corporation, No. A17A0937, Ga. App., 5th Div., 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 541).
SEATTLE - A class complaint accusing a coffee chain of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by revoking employment offers made to job applicants with negative results on their background checks before providing applicants with a copy of the checks and a description of their rights may proceed after a Washington federal judge on Oct. 25 denied the defendant's motion to dismiss (Jonathan Santiago Rosario v. Starbucks Corporation, No. 16-1951, W.D. Wash., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177159).
DETROIT - A class action brought by residents who claim a nearby oil company's emissions are contaminating their properties was revived by a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 26 after it found that the plaintiffs' claims are timely because the allegedly harmful emissions have continued to occur within the last three years (Gregory Cole, et al. v. Marathon Oil Corporation, et al., No. 16-2660, 6th Cir.)
DETROIT - A class action brought by residents who claim a nearby oil company's emissions are contaminating their properties was revived by a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 26 after it found that the plaintiffs' claims are timely because the allegedly harmful emissions have continued to occur within the last three years (Gregory Cole, et al. v. Marathon Oil Corporation, et al., No. 16-2660, 6th Cir.).