KANSAS CITY, Kan. - A class action complaint was filed Oct. 26 against EpiPen maker Mylan N.V. for alleged violations of consumer laws in 19 states (Rosetta Serrano, et al. v. Mylan N.V., et al., No. 16-2711, D. Kan.).
CINCINNATI - The lack of employee signatures on an arbitration agreement does not prevent enforcement, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Oct. 24, finding that under Kentucky law, the employees' decision to continue working "demonstrated assent" (Marlena Aldrich, et al. v. University of Phoenix, Inc., No. 16-5276, 6th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19296).
SAVANNAH, Ga. - The plaintiffs in a personal injury suit against Macy's Retail Holdings Inc. are not entitled to chainwide financial information and regional incident reports, a Georgia federal magistrate judge ruled Oct. 24, denying motions to compel such materials (Jacquelyn Orr, et al. v. Macy's Retail Holdings Inc., No. 4:16-cv-00052, S.D. Ga.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147573).
PHILADELPHIA - In a breach of a lease agreement lawsuit between a class of landowners and an exploration production company, the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Oct. 24 that a trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to reconsider allowing an expert to testify that natural gas sold to third-party buyers was made before any interstate transportation (David F. Pollock, as executor of the estate of Margaret F. Pollock, et al. v. Energy Corporation of America, Nos. 15-2648 & 15-2649, 3rd Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19167).
HOUSTON - A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 21 ruled that dismissal of an amended complaint in a securities class action lawsuit against parties to a merger deal is proper because lead plaintiffs failed to show that alleged misrepresentations and omissions made by the parties regarding debt and future distributions issues were not publicly available and did not contain the required cautionary language (Irving Braun, et al. v. Eagle Rock Energy Partners, LP, et al., No. 15-1470, S.D. Texas; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146035).
SYRACUSE, N.Y. - A reinsurer asked a federal court in New York on Oct. 21 for permission to file a reply to its reinsured's contention that the reinsurer's objections to a pair of discovery orders is untimely (Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Century Indemnity Company, No. 13-cv-00995, N.D. N.Y.).
ATLANTA - A federal judge in Georgia on Oct. 21 granted a pair of insurers' motion to depose certain people to determine if their alleged actions regarding a reinsurer fall under the jurisdiction of the Georgia federal court (Canal Insurance Company, et al. v. Golden Isles Reinsurance Company, Ltd, et al., No. 15-cv-3331, N.D. Ga.).
SAN FRANCISCO - In an Oct. 24 statement filed in California federal court, the plaintiffs in a putative class action alleging violation of an Illinois biometrics law by Facebook Inc. cite two recent federal court rulings that they say support their standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution under the standard established in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins (136 S.Ct. 1540 ) (In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, No. 3:15-cv-03747, N.D. Calif.).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Google Inc. on Oct. 21 filed its answer to a putative class action in California federal court over its purported scanning of emails on its Gmail service, denying that it violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (***) or the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) (Daniel Matera v. Google Inc., No. 5:15-cv-04062, N.D. Calif.).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - A class of current and former McDonald's employees may proceed with their state wage claims against a couple who own and operate 16 franchises in Pennsylvania and pay their hourly employees via JP Morgan Chase Payroll Cards, a Pennsylvania Superior Court panel ruled Oct. 21, determining in a question of first impression that that form of payment, which subjects the employees to fees, does not meet requirements of the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law (WPCL) (Alisha Siciliano, et al. v. Albert/Carol Mueller, et al., No. 1321 MDA 2015, Pa. Super.; 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 596).
DENVER - The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 24 affirmed that a district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a certified sexual assault nurse examiner's testimony that a victim's scratching of herself was consistent with sexual assault and domestic abuse victims coping with the trauma they have experienced (United States of America v. Leslie Chapman, Nos. 15-2143 and 15-2173, 10th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19217).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A District of Columbia federal judge on Oct. 24 granted a motion for summary judgment finding that the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) did not apply to an underlying loan and remanded various causes of action to a state court for lack of jurisdiction (Anthony Floyd v. PNC Mortgage, a division of PNC Bank, N.A., et al., No. 14-2190, D. D.C.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146679).
NEW YORK - A pro se plaintiff's negotiation of a settlement for himself moots his class claims, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Oct. 20 (Todd C. Bank, et al. v. Alliance Health Networks, LLC, FKA Alliance Health Networks, Inc., et al., No. 15-4037, 2nd Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18849).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The District of Columbia Court of Appeals on Oct. 20 adopted the standards embodied in Federal Rule of Evidence 702 over its previous use of the test set forth in Dyas v. United States (376 A.2d 827 [D.C. 1977]) and Frye v. United States (293 F. 1013 [D.C. Cir. 1923]) to govern the admissibility of expert testimony (Motorola Inc., et al. v. Michael Patrick Murray, et al., No. 14-1350, D.C. App.; 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 382).
NEW YORK - A neurologist, a psychologist, an economist and a school principal may not testify as to damages from the loss of the role of an orthodox, Hasidic mother, a New York federal magistrate judge ruled Oct. 20, but he allowed the psychologist and economist to testify about the loss of household services that was experienced as a result of the mother's death (Arnold Hersko, individually and as administrator of the estates of Rochel Hersko and Arnold Hersko v. United States of America, et al., No. 13-CV-3255, S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145552).
NEW ORLEANS - An electrical engineer's failure to test his hypothesis for the cause of a fire on a boat, combined with the engineer's failure to obtain the relevant data, renders his methodology unreliable, a Louisiana federal judge ruled Oct. 20, excluding the testimony (Atlantic Specialty Insurance Co. and Nicholas Chad Gonzalez v. Porter Inc. d/b/a Formula Boats, No. 15-570, E.D. La.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145415).
ATLANTA - The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 20 affirmed a district court's dismissal of a former property owner's wrongful foreclosure claims, finding that she failed to address how an allegedly inadequate notice by a loan servicer caused her to suffer any damages (Sara Bohannon v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al., No. 15-14508, 11th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18843).
ST. LOUIS - A letter from plaintiffs' counsel seeking a settlement in excess of $5 million was not sufficient notice to the defendant that the case was removable to federal court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), a divided Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Oct. 24 (Carla Gibson, et al. v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc., No. 16-8012, 8th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19073).
NEW ORLEANS - A federal court in Texas did not abuse its discretion in excluding the testimony of the plaintiff's expert witness in a medical negligence case, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found Oct. 19, affirming summary judgment for the defendants (Jewel Honey-Love, Individually and as a Representative of the Estate of Larry Lavon Love v. United States of America, et al., No. 16-20080, 5th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18829).
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - In a medical malpractice lawsuit, a Puerto Rico federal judge on Oct. 19 refused to exclude a treating physician's testimony because it is relevant to establish the causal nexus between a man's prior treatment and his alleged injury (Martin Torres-Rivera v. Centro Medico Del Turabo Inc., et al., No. 13-1747, D. Puerto Rico; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145129).
NEWARK, N.J. - Citing Spokeo v. Robbins (136 S.Ct. 1540 ), a New Jersey federal judge on Oct. 20 dismissed a putative class action against J. Crew Inc. under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), finding that the complaint failed to allege any concrete injuries from the retailer's printing too many credit card digits on customers' receipts (Ahmed Kamal v. J. Crew Group Inc., et al., No. 2:15-cv-00190, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145392).
HATTIESBURG, Miss. - In an excessive force lawsuit against a city and its police officers, a Mississippi federal judge excluded on Oct. 18 a police expert's testimony because the opinions consist of legal conclusions based on legal analysis (Sandra Willis, et al. v. City of Hattiesburg, Miss., et al., No. 2:14-CV-89-KS-MTP, S.D. Miss.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144060).
CHICAGO - A defendant charged with providing a minor with a gun used in a crime failed to establish that her expert's testimony on perception and human memory is "necessary for adequate representation," an Illinois federal judge ruled Oct. 20, declining to appoint an expert under the Criminal Justice Act (United States of America v. Vandetta Redwood, No. 16-CR-80, N.D. Ill.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145307).
SANDTON, South Africa - A South African resource company on Oct. 20 said an international arbitrator has found that an international court of arbitration has jurisdiction over a shareholders' dispute in relation to a mining project.
DENVER - A Kansas federal judge properly entered summary judgment for truck drivers on their claim that the motor carrier for whom they worked violated 49 Code of Federal Regulations Sections 376.12(i) by charging them $15 per week to use a satellite communications system, but erred in finding that the drivers were owed damages, the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Oct. 18 (Candace Fox, et al. v. TransAm Leasing, Inc., et al., No. 15-3203, 10th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18654).