LONDON - An England and Wales High Court justice on Feb. 9 ordered a group of Mauritius investors to post security costs in favor of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in relation to the investors' challenge of an arbitral award issued in Pakistan's favor in a dispute over the sale of an energy gas company (Progas Energy Limited, et al. v. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan, No.  EWHC 209 [Comm], England and Wales High, Comm.).
LOS ANGELES - A California court on Feb. 1 affirmed a trial court's dismissal of a purchaser's class action claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and another California law against a solar energy products company, finding that the company was not required to be a licensed contractor to complete its installations (Shawn Reed v. Sunrun Inc., No. B276862, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 2, 2018 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 743).
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal district court's application of a general proximate cause test was the proper test for determining loss causation in a securities class action lawsuit brought by shareholders against a solar energy company and certain of its current and former executive officers, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Jan. 31 in affirming the lower court's ruling and clarifying the lower court's question on appeal (Mineworkers' Pension Scheme v. First Solar Inc., No. 15-17282, 9th Cir., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2450).
EDINBURGH, Scotland - A U.K. energy firm on Jan. 23 gave an update on its pending arbitration with the Indian Income Tax Department, announcing that a final hearing is scheduled for later this year.
KANSAS CITY, Kan. - In a Jan. 17 ruling, a Kansas federal judge denied a motion to refer to the Register of Copyrights allegations by an infringement defendant that a copyright registration for the Oil Daily publications is invalid (Energy Intelligence Group Inc., et al., v. CHS McPherson Refinery Inc., No. 16-1015, D. Kan., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7048).
NEW YORK - A lead plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit against an energy company and certain of its current and former executive officers failed to plead any material misrepresentation or omissions or scienter to support his federal securities law claim that the defendants concealed that the company's former CEO neglected his responsibilities to the company while secretly exercising control over another company that did significant business with the energy company, a federal judge in New York ruled Jan. 10 in granting the defendants' motions to dismiss (Jeffrey Fries v. Northern Oil & Gas Inc., et al., No. 16-6543, S.D. N.Y., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5307).
LEXINGTON, Ky. - A federal judge in Kentucky on Dec. 28 dismissed with prejudice a claim brought by two environmental groups contending that Kentucky Utilities Co. (KU) is violating the Clean Water Act by allowing storm water containing pollutants from its coal-ash settlement ponds to migrate into a navigable waterway, holding that the discharges are not subject to the act's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements (Kentucky Waterways Alliance, et al. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., No. 17-cv-292-DCR, E.D. Ky., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212329).
WILMINGTON, Del. - The revised plan of reorganization for Chapter 11 debtor Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH) cannot be confirmed because its treatment of claimants who have not yet developed an asbestos disease is unlawful and it was proposed in bad faith, eight asbestos personal injury claimants tell the Delaware federal bankruptcy court in a Dec. 19 objection to the plan (In re Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al., No. 14-10979, D. Del. Bkcy.).
SAN FRANCISCO - A collection of environmental advocacy groups on Dec. 19 filed a lawsuit in California federal court against Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke and two federal agencies contending that they are violating federal law with regard to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) final decision to amend the compliance deadlines for what is known as the methane waste prevention rule (Sierra Club, et al. v. Ryan Zinke, et al., No. 17-7187, N.D. Calif.).
NEW ORLEANS - The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 14 affirmed a district court's ruling that a disability claimant's suit is barred under Louisiana's applicable one-year statute of limitations because the suit was not filed within a year after the claimant requested plan documents from the plan administrator (Todd M. Babin v. Quality Energy Services Inc., No. 17-30059, 5th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25275).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The National Labor Relations Board, in a 3-2 decision issued Dec. 15, overruled E.I. du Pont de Nemours, 364 NLRB No. 113 (2016) (DuPont), calling the majority opinion "fundamentally flawed" and holding that an employer's modification of unit employee health care benefits following the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) was simply a continuation of past practice and not a "change" requiring notice to the union and an opportunity to bargain (Raytheon Network Centric Systems and United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, No. 25-CA-092145, NLRB).
OKLAHOMA CITY - Residents who argue that Halliburton Energy Services Inc. (HESI) is liable for contaminating their drinking water supply with perchlorate on Dec. 6 filed a brief in an Oklahoma federal court contending that HESI should be compelled to produce documents and other information (Albin Family Revocable Living Trust, et al. v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc., No. 16-910, W.D. Okla.).
SAN FRANCISCO - Parties in a securities class action lawsuit against a company that sells renewable energy and certain of its executive officers asked a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Dec. 4 to determine whether a federal district court erred in dismissing the action for failure to plead scienter under a holistic approach (James Webb v. SolarCity Corp., et al., No. 16-16440, 9th Cir.).
RICHMOND, Va. - The lead plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit against an energy provider and its CEO asked the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 29 to rehear its appeal of a federal district court's dismissal of its amended complaint for failure to plead scienter, claiming that the panel's opinion affirming the lower court's ruling is in conflict with U.S. Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit precedent (Maguire Financial LP, et al. v. PowerSecure International Inc., et al., No. 16-2163, 4th Cir.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a case that could upend the landscape for patent litigants globally, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Nov. 27 in a dispute over the constitutionality of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO's) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group LLC, No. 16-712, U.S. Sup.).
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Hydraulic fracturing companies on Nov. 16 filed a brief in Arkansas federal court contending that residents who have sued them alleging property damage as a result of the companies' disposal of fracking waste "consistently take liberty with the facts to add more baseless sanctions noise to this case" (Bobbie Hill, et al. v. Southwestern Energy Co., No. 12-500, E.D. Ark.).
MIAMI - A federal judge in Florida on Nov. 17 adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation to deny dismissal of a lawsuit brought by three environmental groups over discharges from a nuclear power plant's facility, holding that the groups have standing to bring their suit under the Clean Water Act (CWA) (Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, et al. v. Florida Power & Light Company, No. 16-23017-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZA-REYES, S.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190504).
RICHMOND, Va. - Shareholders in a securities class action lawsuit against an energy provider and its CEO have failed to show that the CEO acted with the requisite scienter in misrepresenting to investors that the company had secured a contract renewal with a large customer because they have not shown that he knew his statements were misleading at the time he made them, a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Nov. 15 in affirming a federal judge's dismissal of the action (Maguire Financial LP, et al. v. PowerSecure International Inc., et al., No. 16-2163, 4th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 22968).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on Nov. 14 granted a Bulgarian machine-building company's petition to confirm a $2,119,167.79 international arbitral award issued against a California company, finding that enforcement of the award was not against public policy (TMCO Ltd. v. Green Light Energy Solutions R&D Corp., No. 4:17-cv-00997, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188362).