CHICAGO - "Appropriate equitable relief" available under Employee Retirement Income Security Act Section 502(a)(3) includes a make-whole recovery of the expenses a plan participant incurred as the direct result of a fiduciary's breach by misrepresenting the plan's coverage, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled June 13, citing the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Cigna Corp. v. Amara (131 S.Ct. 1866 $(2011$)) (Deborah A. Kenseth v. Dean Health Plan, Inc., No. 11-1560, 7th Cir.; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12083).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 10 affirmed that an arbitrator acted within his powers under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in determining that parties affirmatively "agreed to authorize class arbitration" in a case involving a dispute over a health insurer's reimbursement of physicians' claims (Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John Ivan Sutter, M.D., No. 12-135, U.S. Sup.).
ST. LOUIS - An employer's claims related to an insurer's administering and handling of its employee health care plan are sufficiently pleaded to survive a motion for judgment on the pleadings or preemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a Missouri federal judge found June 6, ruling in the insurer's favor (Anheuser Busch Companies Inc., et al. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. d/b/a CIGNA, No. 4:12-cv-01333, E.D. Mo.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79564).
ALBANY, Ga. - A federal judge in Georgia on June 5 approved the terms of a preliminary injunction agreed to by the Federal Trade Commission and Putney Health System Inc., enjoining the further integration of Georgia hospitals (Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Phoebe Putney Health System Inc., et al., No. 1:11-cv-58, M.D. Ga.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68658).
NEW ORLEANS - Retirees on June 6 gave notice of their intent to appeal to the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a ruling dismissing their claims that they were wrongfully denied benefits owed them under their employee welfare plan in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act because the plan was exempt from ERISA as a governmental plan (Mary Smith, et al. v. Regional Transit Authority, et al., No. 2:12-cv-03059, E.D. La.).
NEWARK, N.J. - In an unpublished opinion, a New Jersey federal judge on May 31 denied a motion by a seller of spinal cord stimulation systems to dismiss a Medicare False Claims Act suit against it, saying the qui tam plaintiffs had pleaded the claims with the required particularity (United States of America ex rel. et al. v. Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp., No. 11-1210, D. N.J.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76612).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on May 31 declined to dismiss a contract dispute involving allegations that a pharmacy benefit manager withdrew deductions from multiple pharmacies' accounts without authorization (Jajco Inc. v. Leader Drugs Stores Inc., et al., No. 12-5703, N.D. Calif.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77830).
HOUSTON - U.S. Judge Lee H. Rosenthal of the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, on May 31 denied a Medicare beneficiary a temporary restraining order (TRO) in her federal lawsuit against Select Specialty Hospital Houston, saying federal courts cannot issue a restraining order enjoining an ongoing state court proceeding. Select had filed its own TRO, seeking a court order requiring Catalina Blanco to vacate the premises and be moved to a lower-level nursing care facility (Catalina Blanco v. Select Specialty Hospital, Houston L.P., No. H-13-1591, S.D. Texas, Houston Div.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77169).
SCRANTON, Pa. - A Pennsylvania federal judge on May 31 granted the government's motion to dismiss a Medicare dispute arising from the termination of a skilled nursing facility's provider agreement for failure to substantially comply with care requirements (Athens Healthcare Inc. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 13-1443, M.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77192).
GREENVILLE, Tenn. - A Tennessee federal judge on May 31 denied a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by a nursing home facility seeking to postpone the termination of its Medicare and Medicaid provider agreement (Bristol Health Care Investors v. Mark Emkes, et al., No. 13-137, E.D. Tenn.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76644).
PASADENA, Calif. - A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on May 31 affirmed a district court's judgment affirming the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) decisions denying benefits under Medicare for dental services (Ronald Fournier, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, No. 12-15478, 9th Cir.; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10997).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge in the District of Columbia on May 24 granted summary judgment to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (DHHS) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in a challenge to a Stark Act-based regulation barring physician groups from self-referring patients for "designated health services" (DHS) at a hospital with which the groups have a financial arrangement (Council for Urological Interests v. Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, et al., No. 09-cv-0546, D. D.C.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73610).
SAN FRANCISCO - A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel withdrew a previous decision and published a new opinion on May 24 that reverses a district court's decision in four cases and vacates preliminary injunctions prohibiting the California Department of Health Care Services and its director from implementing Medi-Cal reimbursement reductions authorized by the California Legislature and approved by the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Managed Pharmacy Care, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., Nos. 12-55067, 12-55068, 12-55103, 12-55315, 12-55331, 12-55332, 12-55334, 12-55335, 12-55550, 12-55554, 9th Cir.; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10718).
COLUMBUS, Ga. - A health plan's and plan sponsor's state law claims against a medical provider to recover benefits erroneously paid by the plan because of the provider's alleged fraudulent misrepresentations are completely preempted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a federal judge in Georgia ruled May 22 (Aflac, Inc., et al. v. Richard Bloom, No. 4:12-CV-331, M.D. Ga.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72106).
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - A Rhode Island federal judge on May 22 found in favor of two health care providers in a contract dispute with a health insurer, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish that the treatment provided by the defendants was not a form of mechanical traction covered by the plan (Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Jay S. Korsen, et al., No. 09-317L, D. R.I.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72463).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on May 28 declined to reconsider the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals' affirmation of a trial court's grant of a preliminary injunction against the Indiana State Department of Health in enforcing a state law stripping Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood of Indiana Inc. because the agency provides abortions (Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, et al. v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana Inc., Nos. 12-1039, 12-1159, U.S. Sup.).
NEWARK, N.J. - A New Jersey federal judge on May 22 granted summary judgment in favor of a health insurer in a wrongful denial of benefits suit, saying that the defendant's decision to deny benefits was not arbitrary and capricious (Montvale Surgical Center LLC v. Aetna Insurance Co., No. 12-2874, D. N.J.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72927).
LEXINGTON, Ky. - A Kentucky federal judge on May 22 denied class certification in a fraud lawsuit between insurance agents and an insurance agency regarding withheld commissions on sold Medicare Advantage plans (Harold David Cowden, et al. v. Parker & Associates Inc., et al., No. 09-323, E.D. Ky.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72253).
ST. LOUIS - A Missouri federal judge on May 20 dismissed a summary judgment motion filed by defendants in a qui tam Federal False Claims Act suit, saying the claims of Medicare and Medicaid fraud filed by relator Health Dimensions Rehabilitation Inc. against RehabCare Group and Rehab Systems Inc. (RSM) are not solely based upon publicly disclosed information but on an investigation by the relator over the course of a year (United States of America ex rel. Health Dimensions Rehabilitation Inc. v. RehabCare Group Inc., et al., No. 4:12CV00848, E.D. Mo., Eastern Div.).
ALBANY, Ga. - A federal judge in Georgia on May 15 granted the Federal Trade Commission's motion to temporarily enjoin Phoebe Putney Health System Inc. from taking any further steps to consolidate Georgia hospitals and from making any price changes to existing contracts following the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling that the state-action doctrine does not immunize the merger from antitrust scrutiny (Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Phoebe Putney Health System Inc., et al., No. 1:11-cv-58, M.D. Ga.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68658).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California appeals court panel held in a May 9 unpublished opinion that a hospital has no duty to inform patients admitted to the emergency room that emergency room physicians do not accept a particular health care plan and to take action to prevent emergency room physicians from "balance billing" (Maria Leon, et al. v. Watsonville Hospital Corp., No. H037288, Calif. App., 6th Dist.; 2013 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3297).
BOSTON - A Massachusetts federal judge on May 9 dismissed a Medicare payment dispute, saying that the plaintiff home health agency failed to exhaust administrative remedies and that, therefore, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case (MJG Management Associates Inc. v. NHIC Corp., et al., No. 12-11414, D. Mass.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66238).
PITTSBURGH - A Pennsylvania federal judge on May 8 granted a motion to reconsider the dismissal of claims brought by a private, nonprofit college, two for-profit entities and the owners of those entities who are challenging the "birth control" mandate contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), saying that the claims are now ripe for review. The judge then went on to partially grant and partially deny the defendants' motion to dismiss (Geneva College, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 12-207, W.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65685).
BROOKLYN, N.Y. - Saying that the U.S. secretary of Health and Human Services is playing politics and that the Food and Drug Administration inked a "sweetheart" deal with Teva Women's Health, a New York federal judge on May 10 granted only a temporary stay of his order for unrestricted sale of the Plan B emergency contraceptives and said the government will have to ask a federal appeals court to issue its own stay because he doubts its likelihood of success (Annie Tummino v. Margaret Hamburg, et al., No. 12-763, E.D. N.Y.).
PITTSBURGH - A federal judge in Pennsylvania on May 7 permitted purchasers of health insurance from Highmark Inc. to withdraw their motion for preliminary approval of their settlement with Highmark of their antitrust claims, where the purchasers argued that Highmark failed to disclose information that demonstrated that the value of the proposed settlement was illusory (Royal Mile Company, Inc., et al. v. UPMC, et al. No. 2:10-cv-01609, W.D. Pa.).