WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - A Florida appeals panel on Aug. 20 held that insureds failed to present any evidence rebutting the presumed prejudice their insurer suffered as a result of their untimely proof of loss of their Hurricane Wilma damage, affirming a lower court's ruling in favor of the insurer (Lloyd Oliver Hunt, et al. v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co., No. 4D13-272, Fla. App., 4th Dist.; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12810).
NEW ORLEANS - The Federal Emergency Management Agency expressly limited a waiver to the $13,888.51 that it paid to Louisiana insureds for their Hurricane Isaac loss, and the insureds failed to file a timely proof of loss for any additional amounts claimed, a Louisiana federal judge ruled Aug. 15, granting FEMA's motion for summary judgment (Shannon Villemarette, et al. v. Federal Emergency Management Agency, et al., No. 13-5400, SECTION: R(5), E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113667).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on Aug. 8 granted insurance agents' motion to dismiss insureds' negligent procurement and negligent misrepresentation claims in a coverage dispute arising from Hurricane Isaac, further dismissing the insureds' claim against Federal Emergency Management Agency for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Michelle Lopez and Stephen Lopez III v. State Farm General Insurance Co., et al., No. 13-6029, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109803).
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. - A federal judge in West Virginia on Aug. 6 refused to dismiss a West Virginia city's lawsuit against the owners of a landfill in Hurricane, W.Va., for alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), ruling that the chemicals at issue render the claim exempt from the statute's 90-day notice requirement (City of Hurricane, West Virginia, et al. v. Disposal Service Management Inc., et al., No. 14-15850, S.D. W.Va.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107897).
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. - A federal judge in West Virginia on Aug. 6 denied a motion to dismiss filed by operators of a landfill, concluding that the City of Hurricane, W.Va., had a valid claim against them for illegal disposal of hazardous chemicals (City of Hurricane, W.Va., et al. v. Disposal Service Incorporated, et al., No. 14-15850, S.D. W.Va.).
NEW ORLEANS - One day after finding that an insured failed to submit a timely proof of loss for his supplemental claim in a Hurricane Isaac coverage dispute, a Louisiana federal judge on July 31 entered judgment in favor of a federal flood insurer (Robert J. Lusco Jr. v. Allstate Insurance Co., et al., No. 13-6634, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103993).
TRENTON, N.J. - A federal judge in New Jersey on July 22 issued an order dismissing an insured's bad faith claim against an insurer for failure to pay on a flood insurance policy after Hurricane Sandy, ruling that the claim is preempted by federal law (Mark Damiano v. Harleysville Insurance Co. of New Jersey, No. 13-7239, D. N.J.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97988).
NEW ORLEANS - Louisiana insureds have failed to state a facially plausible claim against an insurer, a federal judge ruled July 8, granting the insurer's motion to dismiss a breach of contract claim in a coverage dispute over Hurricane Isaac flood damage (Benjamin B. Saunders, et al. v. National Flood Insurance Program, et al., No. 13-5613 SECTION "N" , E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92524).
MIAMI - A trial court erred in finding that a breach of contract lawsuit over Hurricane Wilma damage was barred by Florida's five-year statute of limitations, an appeals panel ruled July 2, reversing and remanding (Nieve and Marisol Linares v. Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Co., No. 3D13-3175, Fla. App., 3rd Dist.; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10168).
NEW ORLEANS - A majority of the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled July 1 that forum selection clauses are not violative of Louisiana public policy, reversing a lower court's finding that overruled a consulting firm's exception of improper venue in a dispute over the firm's evaluation of underlying hurricane damage (Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana, et al., No. 2013-CC-1977, La. Sup.; 2014 La. LEXIS 1568).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on July 1 granted a federal flood insurer's motion to dismiss an insured's claims for declaratory judgment, state law and extracontractual tort claims for pre- and post-judgment interest, attorney fees and penalties in a dispute over Hurricane Isaac coverage (Cynthia W. Bowie v. American Security Insurance Co., et al., No. 13-5698 SECTION: "S" , E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89405).
NEW ORLEANS - The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 26 found that a hotel owner has failed to present extrinsic evidence sufficient to demonstrate that there is a genuine issue of material fact to resolve a construction contract's ambiguity in its favor, affirming a lower federal court's ruling in favor of the construction contractor's insurer in a coverage dispute stemming from hotel damages caused by Hurricane Katrina (WH Holdings L.L.C., et al. v. ACE American Insurance Co., No. 13-30676, 5th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1208).
NEW ORLEANS - The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 23 found that umbrella insurers are liable for an energy exploration and development company's removal of wreck and debris expenses caused by Hurricane Ike damage to its oil rig operations, reversing a lower federal court and rendering judgment in favor of the insured (Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, et al. v. W&T Offshore Inc., No. 13-20512, 5th Cir.).
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - A Florida appeals panel on June 18 refused to reconsider its previous ruling that ordered a lower court to grant a homeowners insurer the right to attorney fees in a Hurricane Wilma dispute (Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Magdiel Perez, No. 4D12-1412, Fla. App., 4th Dist.; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9196; See May 2014, Page 17).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on June 6 found that it is premature to determine whether an insurer acted in bad faith under Louisiana Revised Statutes, denying an insurer's motion for summary judgment as to bad faith damages in a coverage dispute arising from wind and flood damage caused by Hurricane Isaac (The Estate of Amelia Marquez v. Allstate Insurance Co., No. 13-5692, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77274).
NEW ORLEANS - Because there is a dispute over the scope of coverage under a standard flood insurance policy (SFIP), the insured's invocation of the appraisal clause is improper, a Louisiana federal judge ruled June 3 (Michael Vernon Sharpe v. American National Property and Casualty Co., No. 13-161, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76088).
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - Citing a failure of plaintiffs in certain Hurricane Sandy damage cases to respond to a previous directive to voluntarily dismiss or explain the basis for continuing state law bad faith and related claims against their respective insurers, a committee of New York federal magistrate judges on June 5 recommended dismissal of all such state law claims in those cases (In re: Hurricane Sandy Cases, No. 14 MC 41, E.D. N.Y.).
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - The Florida Supreme Court on June 5 overturned its previous decision and denied review of an appeals court's ruling that an insured's failure to submit to an examination under oath (EUO) did not prejudice an insolvent insurance company in a dispute over Hurricane Charley property damage (Florida Insurance Guaranty Association Inc. v. Whistler's Park Inc., No. SC12-1661, Fla. Sup.; 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1810).
NEW ORLEANS - An insured has failed to submit a timely signed and sworn proof of loss of her Hurricane Isaac damage and the National Flood Insurance Act (NFIA) does not authorize her extracontractual claims against her insurer, a Louisiana federal judge ruled June 3, dismissing the coverage lawsuit (Janina Howell-Douglas v. Fidelity National Indemnity Insurance Co., No. 13-5578, E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75469).
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - A New York federal judge on May 29 denied an insured's motion to remand a fraud lawsuit arising from Hurricane Irene to state court, finding that federal jurisdiction is proper because federal funds are at stake (Edward Marzocchi v. Selective Insurance Company of New York, No. CV 14-1026, E.D. N.Y.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74086).
NEW ORLEANS - The simple fact that insureds submitted a proof of loss that referenced their policy limits but did not provide a specific amount does not render the proof of loss invalid under a standard flood insurance policy (SFIP), a Louisiana federal judge ruled May 22, noting that the proof of loss was further supplemented by a detailed, specific estimate (Ronnie Smith, et al. v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, No. 13-5684 SECTION "L" $(4$), E.D. La.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70371).
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. - Finding that a New York county's bad faith claim against its insurer was "inherently tied to [its] breach of contract claim" and based on the insurer's same alleged failure to perform contractual duties, a New York federal judge on May 14 dismissed the bad faith claim as duplicative (County of Orange v. The Travelers Indemnity Co., No. 7:13-cv-06790, S.D. N.Y.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66451).
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - Finding that a question of fact remains regarding whether insureds sufficiently complied with a policy's cooperation provisions, a Florida appeals panel on May 14 reversed a lower court's ruling in favor of the insurer in a Hurricane Wilma coverage dispute (Roberto Solano, et al. v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co., No. 4D12-1198, Fla. App., 4th Dist.; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7105).
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - The Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) did not affirmatively deny homeowners' claim for hurricane damage, a Florida appeals panel held May 8, affirming the denial of attorney fees to the homeowners following a successful appraisal award for coverage under an insolvent insurance policy (Marcline Alexis, et al. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, No. 4D13-1080, Fla. App., 4th Dist.; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6839).