NEW YORK - Chapter 11 debtor Rapid-American Corp. and the asbestos claimants in its case asked a New York federal bankruptcy judge on Aug. 15 to stop the debtor's insurers from enforcing subpoenas they issued to six asbestos claims-processing facilities, saying the subpoenas are "facially overbroad and seek material that is wholly irrelevant" to the issues in an insurance coverage adversary action (Rapid-American Corporation, et al. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, et al., No. 15-01095, S.D. N.Y. Bkcy.).
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - An insured sued the Federal Emergency Management Agency, its administrators and Wright National Flood Insurance Co. on Aug. 17 in a New York federal court, alleging that he was wrongfully denied $141,274.50 in insurance proceeds for Superstorm Sandy damage to his Long Beach, N.Y., home (David Clutter v. William B. Long, et al., No. 17-4833, E.D. N.Y.).
DALLAS - A Texas federal judge on Aug. 15 granted an insured's motion to dismiss its commercial insurer's declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for alleged storm damage to the insured's motel, finding that the majority of the factors in Brillhart v. Excess Ins. Co. of Am., 316 U.S. 491, 495, 62 S. Ct. 1173, 86 L. Ed. 1620 (1942), weigh in favor of dismissal (GuideOne National Insurance Company v. Bhav Harri, LLC, No. 16-00740, N.D. Texas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129473).
ST. LOUIS - A Missouri federal judge on Aug. 16 refused to stay a professional liability insurer's dispute against an insolvent insurer over wrongful act claims submitted by the insolvent insurer because she found that the contractual issues are not pivotal to the underlying state court liquidation action (Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. Galen Insurance Co., et al., No. 17-1185, E.D. Mo., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130426).
ST. LOUIS - A jury's award of $2.75 million in favor of a plaintiff who was injured while a passenger in an insured vehicle was not excessive and was justified based on the jury's finding that the insurer deceived the passenger regarding coverage on the insured vehicle, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Aug. 15 (Laura Dziadek v. The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., Nos. 16-4070, 16-4210, 8th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15270).
NEW ORLEANS - A Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Aug. 17 affirmed a jury's verdict convicting a man of committing health care fraud and paying and receiving kickbacks for approving patients for home health care when they did not need such treatment (United States v. Warren Dailey, No. 16-20517, 5th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15595).
ST. LOUIS - A federal judge on Aug. 15 sentenced a podiatrist to 90 months in prison and ordered him to pay $6.9 million in restitution for fraudulently billing Medicare for services that were not rendered (United States v. Yev Gray, No. 15cr464, E.D. Mo.).
KALAMAZOO, Mich. - A disability insurer did not act arbitrarily and capriciously when it classified a claimant's own occupation as sedentary because it relied on information from the claimant and the claimant's employer, a Michigan federal judge said Aug. 15 (Daniel Venier v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, No. 15-1016, W.D. Mich., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129691).
BOSTON - A federal judge in Massachusetts on Aug. 16 trimmed some claims from a lawsuit brought by the Government Employees Insurance Co. (GEICO) against a chiropractic firm and its owners, finding that while the insurer's claims were timely and not barred by Massachusetts' Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (anti-SLAPP) statute, the company's claims for civil conspiracy, money had and received, breach of contract and intentional interference with advantageous business relationships were not sufficiently pleaded (Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C., et al., No. 16-cv-10642-ADB, D. Mass., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130278).
PHILADELPHIA - In a breach of contract suit, an insurer moved for clarification on Aug. 11 with a Pennsylvania federal court to confirm that it is to produce only unredacted versions of documents previously produced with redactions based on proprietary material, reserves and "other reinsurance" information and additional documents reflecting the date when the insurer provided first notice of asbestos claims to other reinsurers of relevant policies (R&Q Reinsurance Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., No. 16-1473, E.D. Pa.).
GREENVILLE, Miss. - The U.S. Department of Justice announced Aug. 10 that a federal judge in Mississippi has sentenced a doctor to 39 months in prison and ordered him to pay $1.9 million in restitution to the Medicare program for referring patients to hospice care when such treatment was not necessary (United States v. Nathaniel Brown, No. 16cr74, N.D. Miss.).
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. - A reinsurer on Aug. 14 appealed to the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a ruling requiring it to pay up to an additional $18 million in reinsurance proceeds to an insurer pursuant to an arbitration award (General Re Life Corp. v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co., No. 17-2496, 2nd Cir.).
NEW YORK - Reinsurance executives argue in an Aug. 14 reply brief that a New York federal court should compel arbitration of insurers' $50 million Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act case or, alternatively, stay the dispute "in the interests of fairness and judicial economy" (Bankers Conseco Life Insurance Co., et al. v. Moshe M. Feuer, et al., No. 16-7646, S.D. N.Y.).
DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. - A majority of a Florida appeals panel on Aug. 11 held that no Florida statute or case law precludes an insured from filing a civil remedy notice (CRN) while a demand for appraisal is outstanding, reversing and remanding a lower court's ruling in favor of the insurer in a bad faith lawsuit arising from the insured's claim for sinkhole damage (Phillip Landers v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co., No. 5D15-4032, Fla. App., 5th Dist., 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11543).
HOUSTON - A registered nurse who owned two home health care companies was found guilty on Aug. 10 by a federal jury in Texas of one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and four counts of health care fraud for her role in a $20 million Medicare fraud scheme (United States v. Evelyn Mokwuah, No. 16cr254, S.D. Texas).
SEATTLE - A Washington appeals panel on Aug. 14 found that because an insured intentionally struck another person in the face several times and the harm of a broken jaw was reasonably foreseeable, there are no issues of material fact regarding whether the insured's act was intentional (State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Nikolas Peters, No. 75705-9-I, Wash. App., Div. 1, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 1935).
CINCINNATI - The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 15 affirmed a lower federal court's finding that parties were properly aligned in a dispute over whether additional coverage is owed to satisfy an underlying $3,736,278 judgment against an insured for breaching its duty to exercise ordinary care to maintain its common areas, affirming the lower court's reinstatement of its judgment in favor of the insurer (Evanston Insurance Co. v. Housing Authority of Somerset, et al., No. 16-6691, 6th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15199).
SAN FRANCISCO - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 15 vacated and remanded a district court's ruling that a de novo standard of review rather than an abuse of discretion standard of review should be applied in a disability benefits dispute because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act preempts the application of California's insurance law, which prohibits the use of discretionary clauses (Yvette Williby v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., No. 15-56394, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15213).
MIAMI - An insured's suit seeking a declaration that coverage is owed for water damage to his home was removed to Florida federal court on Aug. 14 by the insurer on the basis that the amount in controversy satisfies the federal jurisdictional amount in controversy (Romeo Alcantara v. American Security Insurance Co., No. 17-23077, S.D. Fla.).
OKLAHOMA CITY - An Oklahoma judge on Aug. 10 terminated policy coverage and authorized the return of unearned premiums to insureds in the receivership of SeniorSure Healthplan Inc. (State of Oklahoma, ex rel. John D. Doak v. SeniorSure Healthplan Inc., No. CJ-2017-3547, Okla. Dist., Okla. Co.).
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. - A general contractor's insurance company was awarded summary judgment by a federal judge in Alabama on Aug. 10 after the judge found that the insurer was not obligated to defend the contractor against counterclaims brought by a couple who refused to pay for upgrades that increased the price of a home improvement project (Canal Indemnity Company v. Frankie Carbin, et al., No. 16-cv-00630-ABK, N.D. Ala., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126662).
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - The Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Association (TIGA) argues in an Aug. 14 brief that a Tennessee federal court should remand its reimbursement dispute over a workers' compensation claim against book publishers because diversity jurisdiction is not present (Tennessee Insurance Guaranty Association v. Penguin Random House LLC, et al., No. 17-1070, M.D. Tenn.).
BOISE, Idaho - A trust bank on Aug. 14 moved for an order in an Idaho federal court to lift a stay pending an insurer's receivership proceedings and for a preliminary injunction, arguing that the receiver has ignored a summary judgment ruling for more than two years and recommended that the insured take nothing (Idaho Trust Bank v. BancInsure Inc., et al., No. 12-00032, D. Idaho).
ST. LOUIS - Replacing drywall and insulation as a result of a subcontractor's faulty fire suppression system did not constitute an "accident" under a general liability insurance policy, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Aug. 11, affirming the dismissal of breach of contract and bad faith claims against an insurer (McShane Construction Company LLC v. Gotham Insurance Co., No. 16-2632, 8th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14875).
ST. LOUIS - The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 14 affirmed a district court's ruling that a policy's pollution exclusion precludes an insurer's duty to indemnify an underlying personal injury suit arising out of carbon monoxide poisoning because the underlying injuries clearly arose out of the release, dispersal or migration of carbon monoxide into the atmosphere (Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Christopher A. Klick, et al., No. 16-4000, 8th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15017).