ALBANY, N.Y. - A reinsurer told a federal court in New York on Aug. 12 that it intends to appeal to the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals an order of the trial court that it pay $941,433 in prejudgment interest to its reinsured (Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Clearwater Insurance Co., No. 13-cv-1178, N.D. N.Y.).
MOBILE, Ala. - An insured failed to demonstrate that an Alabama federal court does not have personal jurisdiction to hear a dispute regarding insurance coverage between the insured and its two insurers over construction defect claims, an Alabama federal judge ruled Aug. 12 (Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co., et al. v. ARD Contracting Inc., No. 16-0185, S.D. Ala.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106891).
SHREVEPORT, La. - A Louisiana appeals panel on Aug. 10 reversed a lower court's ruling in favor of an errors and omissions insurer in a dispute arising from the sale of a property with mineral rights (Jim And Freida Heath v. Continental Casualty Co., et al., No. 50,860-CA, La. App., 2nd Cir.; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1548).
DETROIT - While a subrogated insurer's gross negligence claim was not barred by a waiver-of-a subrogation clause, a Michigan appeals panel held Aug. 9 that the insurer failed to assert more than an ordinary negligence claim against a contractor and subcontractor for the faulty installation of a sprinkler system (Lexington Insurance Co. v. The Alan Group and Condor Piping Inc., No. 326921, Mich. App.; 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1486).
NEW ORLEANS - A commercial general liability insurance policy's "tract housing" precludes coverage to a group of homeowners who settled a construction defect lawsuit with its insured and then sought payment, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Aug. 10 (Jay Broughton, et al. v. Castlepoint National Insurance Co., formerly known as SUA Insurance Co. & Jennifer Trevino, et al. v. Castlepoint National Insurance Co., formerly known as SUA Insurance Co., No. 15-20708, 5th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14746).
DETROIT - A 2-1 panel of a Michigan appeals court on Aug. 9 reluctantly reversed a ruling awarding summary judgment to a man and a hospital seeking coverage from Allstate Insurance Co. for injuries the man sustained as a result of an automobile accident, holding that it was bound by the ruling in Bazzi v. Sentinel Ins. Co. (2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1153 [Mich. App. 2016]) to find that the innocent third-party doctrine is not viable (Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLC, et al. v. Allstate Insurance Company, No. 323425, Mich. App.; 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1500).
PASADENA, Calif. - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 9 affirmed a lower federal court's ruling that an insurer's equitable contribution claim against a second insurer fails because the insurers did not share the same level of risk (Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA, Inc., et al. v. Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Company, Ltd., No. 14-56337, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14622).
SAVANNAH, Ga. - A federal judge in Georgia on Aug. 9 awarded summary judgment to an insurance company seeking to rescind a general liability policy issued to a law firm, ruling that the innocent insured provision did not apply to the firm and a partner because misrepresentations on the policy application were material (Proassurance Casualty Company v. Wilson R. Smith, et al., No. 15-CV-51, S.D. Ga.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105033).
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. - An insured's faulty workmanship does not constitute an "occurrence" under a commercial general liability insurance policy, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled Aug. 9, relying on Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. (589 Pa. 317, 908 A.2d 888, 896 [Pa. 2006]) to find an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify (Acuity, a mutual insurance company v. Knisely & Sons, Inc., et al., No. 15-76, W.D. Pa.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104431).
SHERMAN, Texas - A claims adjuster and adjusting company were improperly joined in an insurance breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit because an insured failed to provide any fact to show that those defendants' actions were in violation of the Texas Insurance Code, a federal judge in Texas ruled Aug. 8 in denying the insured's motion to remand (Lillian Elizondo v. Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Co. of Texas, et al., No. 16-306, E.D. Texas; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103878).
LOS ANGELES - A California appeals panel on Aug. 5 held that the lack of an excess judgment against Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc. in an underlying employment injury dispute that settled does not preclude the equitable subrogation and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing lawsuit that the entertainment company's excess insurer brought against its primary insurer (Ace American Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., No. B264861, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 4; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 647).
CINCINNATI - The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 8 found that the National Flood Insurance Act (NFIA) does not preempt insureds' state law claims to the extent that they arise solely from the process of procuring a federal flood insurance policy, reversing a lower federal court in part in a dispute arising from flood damage (Michael H. Harris, et al. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al., No. 15-6132, 6th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14501).
NEW YORK - Based on a recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals regarding allocation, a New York federal judge on Aug. 8 granted an insured's motion for reconsideration and said that in light of the Court of Appeals' decision, an all-sums method of allocation, not a pro rata method of allocation, must be applied to policies with noncumulation clauses (Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. The Fairbanks Co., Nos. 13-3755, 15-1141, S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104250).
CINCINNATI - The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 3 held that a lower federal court failed to consider whether parties were properly aligned in a dispute over whether an insurer owes an additional $1 million to $3 million to satisfy an underlying $3,736,278 judgment against its insured for breaching its duty to exercise ordinary care to maintain its common areas (Evanston Insurance Company v. Housing Authority of Somerset and Griffin, et al., No. 16-5018, 6th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14465).
SALT LAKE CITY - An insurer owes no coverage for water damage to its insureds' home and personal property caused when rain entered the home before a new roof installation was complete because the incomplete roof does not constitute a roof as required by the policy, the Utah Court of Appeals affirmed Aug. 4 (Annalee Poulsen et al. v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, No. 20150498, Utah App.; 2016 Utah App. LEXIS 175).
TRENTON, N.J. - A company successor is entitled to allege claims for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing as long as those claims pertain to coverage for environmental contamination that predated the successor's acquisition of the insured's company, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court said Aug. 4 (Haskell Properties LLC v. The American Insurance Co., et al., No. A-1452-14T2, N.J. Super., App. Div.; 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1836).
SEATTLE - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 3 affirmed a lower federal court's ruling that a directors and officers liability insurer has no duty to defend its insured against an underlying lawsuit arising from the insured's termination of a technology license agreement (TLA), finding that coverage is barred by the policy's contractual liability exclusion (X2 Biosystems Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co., No. 14-35125, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14153).
NEW ORLEANS - The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 4 vacated a Louisiana federal judge's ruling in favor of an insured seeking coverage for mitigation projects undertaken to address alleged violations of the Clean Air Act (CAA) because questions of fact exist as to whether the measures undertaken by the insured are "remediation costs" as defined by the policy at issue (Louisiana Generating LLC, et al. v. Illinois Union Insurance Co., et al., No. 15-30914, 5th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14344).
SCRANTON, Pa. - A Pennsylvania federal judge on Aug. 2 partially denied a life insurance company's motion to dismiss a putative class action for benefits under an Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan, finding that a section of a state motor vehicle statute "regulates insurance" and is therefore saved from ERISA preemption (Eric Yost, et al. v. Anthem Life Insurance Co., No. 3:16-cv-00079, M.D. Pa.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101202).
NEW YORK - Uncertain as to whether the claims for which an insured is liable are related to damages to window wall systems themselves or to other property owned by the condominium unit owners, a New York federal judge on Aug. 2 denied summary judgment to an insurer on the duty to defend and indemnify an underlying action (American Home Assurance Co. v. Allan Window Technologies, Ltd., No. 15-5138, S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101118).
TRENTON, N.J. - Consequential damages caused by the subcontractors' faulty workmanship constitute "property damage," and water damage from rain flowing into the interior of the property due to that faulty work is an "occurrence" under a commercial general liability insurance policy, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Aug. 4 (Cypress Point Condominium Association Inc. v. Adria Towers LLC, et al., No. A-13/14, N.J. Sup.; 2016 N.J. LEXIS 847).
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - A Missouri federal judge on Aug. 1 granted insureds' motion to certify a class in a lawsuit alleging that their homeowners insurer unlawfully applied a policy's $1,000 deductible to an actual cash value (ACV) payment in a hailstorm coverage dispute (Eric Lafollette v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., No. 14-04147, W.D. Mo.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99980).
CAMDEN, N.J. - A New Jersey federal judge on Aug. 2 found that extraordinary circumstances excuse insureds' untimely filing of affidavits of merit in a Superstorm Sandy coverage dispute (Brian McMullin, et al. v. Harleysville Insurance Co., Inc., et al., No. 14-7537, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101491).
ABINGDON, Va. - A federal judge in Virginia on Aug. 2 affirmed the convictions of the owners of a laboratory who were found guilty of health care fraud and conspiracy to commit health care fraud for conducting unnecessary drug screenings and billing insurers, holding that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in Universal Health Services Inc. v. United States (135 S. Ct. 1989 ) did not apply to the present case (United States of America v. Beth Palin, et al., No. 14cr00023, W.D. Va.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100743).
ST. PAUL, Minn. - A group disability policy's three-year limitations provision is not unconstitutional or invalid under Minnesota law because Minnesota's statutes pertaining to the statute of limitations for filing suits do not apply to group policies, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said Aug. 2 (Lora Walker v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co., No. 15-2570, 8th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13988).