PHILADELPHIA - In a misappropriation of trade secrets lawsuit, a company's employee in its marketing department is unqualified due to a lack of technical knowledge to testify on issues such as "branding, trademark confusion, customer reactions, business ethics, or trademark law," a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled Oct. 12, excluding the testimony (Alpha Pro Tech Inc. v. VWR International LLC, No. 12-1615, E.D. Pa.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141030).
THE HAGUE, Netherlands - The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) on Aug. 15 provided an update in an arbitration commenced by a bank and finance company pursuant to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules against the Russian Federation (PJSC CB PrivatBank, et al. v. Russian Federation, No. 2015-21, PCA).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A wind energy company on June 13 filed a petition in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to vacate an international arbitration award in which a tribunal of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) dismissed all claims asserted by it against Canada in relation to alleged violations of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, No. 16-cv-1101, D. D.C.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A tribunal for the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) on June 1 released its award in an arbitration commenced by a Florida company against the Dominican Republic under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA), finding that the case was time-barred and that the claimant failed to satisfy the conditions of DR-CAFTA (Corona Materials LLC v. Dominican Republic, No. ARB[AF]/14/3, ICSID).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) on May 10 announced that it will hold a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in a case in which Eli Lilly & Co. assert that the government of Canada breached the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, No. UNCT/14/2, ICSID).
ALEXANDRIA, Va. - In a 46-page ruling issued April 28, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) indicated that it will review the patentability of an invention that claims repositioning of market information on a graphical user interface (GUI) and electronic trading (IBG LLC and Interactive Brokers LLC v. Trading Technologies International Inc., No. CBM2016-0009, PTAB).
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - A Connecticut federal judge on April 5 held that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether an employment practices liability insurer's investigation of an unlawful discharge claim was reasonable, sufficient and/or properly conducted, allowing part of a claim that the insurer violated Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (CUIPA) and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) to proceed (Teri Tucker v. American International Group Inc., et al., No. 09-1499, D. Conn.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46676).
NEW YORK - A judge for the U.S. Court of International Trade on Feb. 18 granted the federal government's motion to stay a number of cases against an insurer in liquidation, where the government seeks allegedly unpaid supplemental antidumping duties covered by bonds issued by the insolvent insurer (United States v. Lincoln General Insurance Company, Nos. 13-cv-00084, 13-cv-00085, 13-cv-00086, 13-cv-00087, 13-cv-00088, 13-cv-00089, 13-cv-00090, 13-cv-00091 and 13-cv-00092, U.S. Internat. Trade).
SAN FRANCISCO - In what he deemed a "thorny" and "somewhat rare policy dilemma," U.S. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. of the Northern District of California on Dec. 30 granted a plaintiff's request to stay its own patent infringement litigation in favor of a later-filed proceeding before the International Trade Commission (ITC) (Aliphcom d/b/a Jawbone and Bodymedia Inc. v. Fitbit Inc., No. 15-2579, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173078).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A decision by the International Trade Commission to impose a civil penalty of $6.2 million against two patent defendants was affirmed Nov. 12 by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (DeLorme Publishing Company et al. v. International Trade Commission, No. 14-1572, Fed. Cir.).
SANTA ANA, Calif. - A federal judge in California on Nov. 9 denied a motion to dismiss filed by defendants in a securities class action lawsuit, ruling that, among other things, the lead plaintiffs have standing to sue for insider trading (Anthony Basile, et al. v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., et al., No. 14-2004, C.D. Calif.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A decision by the International Trade Commission that affirmed findings by an administrative law judge (ALJ) that digital data is an "article" covered by Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 was reversed and remanded Nov. 10 by a divided Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (ClearCorrect Operating LLC and ClearCorrect Pakistan [Private] Ltd. v. International Trade Commission and Align Technology Inc., No. 14-1527, Fed. Cir.).
CHICAGO - In a breach-of-agreement lawsuit, an Illinois federal judge on Nov. 1 excluded testimony regarding a clean-room design, the termination of the supply agreement and the disclosure of trade secrets to third parties (Miller UK Ltd. and Miller International Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc., No. 10-03770, N.D. Ill.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147843).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A tribunal for the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes on Oct. 12 released an order in which it found that the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Rules on Transparency will apply to an arbitration commenced by a Guernsey mining company against the Republic of Guinea, with the exception of certain amendments (BSG Resources Limited v. Republic of Guinea, No. ARB/14/22, ICSID).
MEMPHIS, Tenn. - A Lanham Act dispute over cable ties with an oval-head design will proceed in Tennessee federal court, a federal judge ruled Oct. 13 (Thomas & Betts International LLC, et al. v. Burndy LLC, No. 14-2296, W.D. Tenn.).
VIENNA, Austria - The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) on Oct. 6 announced that the Republic of Congo, Gabon and Madagascar have signed the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention on Transparency).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The International Trade Commission did not err in interpreting Section 337 of the Tariff Act, which declares the importation of infringing products unlawful, as inclusive of goods that, after importation, are used by an importer to directly infringe at the inducement of the goods' seller, a divided, en banc Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Aug. 10 (Suprema Inc. and Mentalix Inc. v. International Trade Commission and Cross Match Technologies Inc., No. 12-1170, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13929).
SAN JOSE, Costa Rica - The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) on July 9 announced that it held a hearing in Costa Rica in an arbitration filed under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) rules (Consorcio John W. McDougall Company Inc. y Dredge & Marine Corporation [U.S.A.] and El Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad - ICE [Costa Rica], PCA).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), made in the context of assessing underlying patent infringement allegations, that the domestic industry requirements of 19 U.S. Code Section 337 can be satisfied by qualitative factors alone was reversed May 11 by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Lelo Inc., et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al., No. 13-1582, Fed. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7708).
BOSTON - A Massachusetts federal judge on Feb. 18 granted a motion to stay by declaratory judgment defendant Converse Inc., pending resolution of a related action before the International Trade Commission (ITC) (New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc. v. Converse Inc., No. 14-14715, D. Mass.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19244).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A final determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that five patents relating to code division multiple access (CDMA) networks were not infringed or invalid was proper, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Feb. 18 (InterDigital Communications Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, No. 14-1176, Fed. Cir.).
CHICAGO - Although denying a request by declaratory judgment patent plaintiff Chicago Board Options Exchange Inc. (CBOE) for reimbursement of fees it incurred with various expert witnesses, an Illinois federal judge on Dec. 10 awarded CBOE its attorney fees after finding that the dispute over CBOE's screen-based trading system "CBOEdirect" became "exceptional" following a May 2012 ruling by the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Chicago Board Options Exchange Inc. v. International Securities Exchange LLC, No. 07-623, N.D. Ill.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170651).