LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
    Mealey's Labor & Employment - United Airlines Will Pay $6.15 Million To Settle Pilot Pension Suit

    DENVER - A Colorado federal judge on May 19 granted final approval of a settlement under which United Airlines Inc. will pay $6.15 million to end a class complaint filed by a pilot who alleges he and others were denied full pension contributions while on long-term military leave (James Daniel Tuten, et al. v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 12-1561, D. Colo.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68336).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Retired Football Players Sue NFL, Allege Misuse Of Narcotics

    SAN FRANCISCO - Eight retired professional football players filed a class complaint on May 20 in a California federal court, accusing the National Football League (NFL) of recklessly treating players will narcotics to keep them on the field and, in doing so, "substitute$(ed$) players' health for profit" (Richard Dent, et al. v. National Football League, No. 14-2324, N.D. Calif.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Illinois Federal Judge Sets Terms Of Injunction In Reimbursement Dispute

    CHICAGO - An Illinois federal judge on May 19 set the terms a permanent injunction should take against a Blue Cross Blue Shield entity found to have failed to provide adequate notice and appeal notices before recouping money from previously paid claims, saying the injunction would provide relief only to members of the chiropractic association involved and not all providers associated with the defendant and that the injunction would provide only prospective relief instead of the retroactive relief requested by the plaintiff (Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association, et al. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, et al., No. 09-5619, N.D. Ill.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Magistrate Judge Limits Time, Scope Of EEOC Employee's Deposition

    SAN JOSE, Calif. - A federal judge in California on May 16 limited the time and scope of a deposition that a senior investigator of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission must give in an employment retaliation suit and denied the agency's request to depose its local director, finding that it was not necessary (Carlos Leglu v. County of Santa Clara, No. 13-cv-01376 BLF, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67882).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - PetSmart's $10 Million Deal In Wage-And-Hour, UCL Action Gets 1st Approval

    SAN JOSE, Calif. - National pet supply retailer PetSmart Inc. will pay $10 million to settle wage-and-hour claims by more than 16,000 of its pet groomers and other employees who say that PetSmart's improper compensation practices violate California's unfair competition law (UCL), according to an agreement that a federal judge preliminarily approved May 14 (Danette M. Moore, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc., No. 12-03577, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67235).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Judge Awards Attorney Fees To Nonparty Who Successfully Quashed Subpoena

    MONTGOMERY, Ala. - A federal magistrate judge in Alabama on May 16 ordered counsel for a plaintiff in a sexual harassment and discrimination suit to pay the fees associated with a motion to quash a subpoena served on a nonparty after finding that the subpoena did not provide the deponent with adequate time to comply and because it requested production of privileged information (Noria C. Green v. Mobis Alabama LLC, et al., No. 12cv277, M.D. Ala.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67373).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Virginia City Seeks To Settle Police Overtime Suit For $3.2M

    NORFOLK, Va. - The City of Norfolk, Va., and a class of city police officers filed a joint motion for a $3.2 million settlement on May 15 seeking to end an overtime class complaint (William Keith Winingear, et al. v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, No. 12-560, E.D. Va.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Partial Settlements In Class Suit Against High-Tech Employers Get Final Approval

    SAN JOSE, Calif. - A federal judge in California on May 16 granted final approval to $20 million in partial class action settlements with Intuit Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. and Pixar of an antitrust suit accusing high-tech companies of conspiring to fix and suppress employee compensation and to restrict employee mobility by entering into agreements not to compete for one another's employees (In Re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, No. 11-2509, N.D. Calif.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - 8th Circuit Enforces Award Reinstating Employee Fired Over Drug Testing

    ST. LOUIS - A mechanic who entered into a "last chance agreement" (LCA) with his employer after he suspected that he would test positive during a random drug test - but never did - must be reinstated, an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled May 14 (Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 53, No. 12-3712, 8th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8953).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - High Court Denies Review Of Fiduciary Duty Regarding Retained Asset Accounts

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on May 19 denied review of a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that a life insurance company did not breach its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act when it chose to pay the beneficiary with a retained asset account and then invested the retained assets for its own profit (Connie J. Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, No. 13-934, U.S. Sup.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Split 4th Circuit: 2 Incidents Were Too Isolated To Prove Bias Claims

    RICHMOND, Va. - A former Maryland hotel employee who was fired shortly after complaining of being called a racially derogatory name by another employee who was friends with the hotel owner failed to prove her racial discrimination and retaliation claims, a split Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled May 13 (Reya C. Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation, et al., No. 13-1473, 4th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8901).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - 11th Circuit: Jones Act Does Not Cover Injuries Caused By Work Stress

    ATLANTA - An injury allegedly caused by work-related stress is not cognizable under the Jones Act, the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled May 15, reversing a trial court's denial of a motion for a judgment as a matter of law (William C. Skye v. Maersk Line, Limited Corporation, d.b.a. Maersk Line Limited, No. 12-16433, 11th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9017).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - 5th Circuit: Airport Director Failed To Prove Age Bias Caused His Termination

    NEW ORLEANS - The former executive director of the regional airport in Tupelo, Miss., failed to prove that his termination was due to his age rather than the board's belief that he could not be trusted to tell the truth, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled May 15 (Terry Anderson v. Tupelo Regional Airport Authority, No. 13-60666, 5th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9068).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - 9th Circuit Reinstates Auto Parts Chain Store Managers' Wage Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO - Factual disputes remain as to whether store managers employed by an auto parts chain primarily performed managerial duties, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled May 12, reversing a trial court's grant of summary judgment in the employer's favor (Michael L. Taylor, et al. v. AutoZone, Inc., et al., No. 12-15378, 9th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8852).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Texas Federal Judge: Settlement Approval Stands In Wage MDL

    HOUSTON - A Texas federal judge on May 12 declined to reconsider approval of a settlement in two cases that are part of a multidistrict litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas alleging that Wachovia Corp., Wachovia Mortgage Corp. and World Mortgage Co. - collectively, Wachovia - and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank - collectively, Wells Fargo - misclassified mortgage workers to avoid paying them overtime wages (In re: Wells Fargo Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation [No. III], No. 11-2266, S.D. Texas; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64843).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - N.Y. Federal Judge Authorizes Notice For Warner Bros. Interns In Wage Dispute

    NEW YORK - A New York federal judge on May 13 granted a motion for court-authorized notice in a class complaint filed by students who worked for a Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) subsidiary and allege that they were improperly misclassified as unpaid interns (Kyle Grant, et al. v. Warner Music Group Corp., et al., No. 13-4449, S.D. N.Y.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65664).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - U.S. Immune From Doctor's Work-Related Claims, Federal Judge Finds

    SAN DIEGO - A doctor cannot pursue claims under the California Labor Code and unfair competition law (UCL) against his former employer, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VA), because the claims are barred by sovereign immunity, a federal judge held May 9 (Walter M. Shaw v. Veterans Health Administration, et al., No. 12-2369, S.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64598).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Wendy's Accused Of Paying Employees Less Than The Minimum Wage

    LAS VEGAS - A fast food restaurant chain in Nevada illegally paid employees less than the lawful minimum wage after claiming that it had the right to compensate employees at a reduced minimum wage rate under the Nevada Constitution, four employees allege in a class complaint filed May 9 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (Latonya Tyus, et al. v. Wendy's of Las Vegas, Inc., et al., No. 14-729, D. Nev.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - 4th Circuit Upholds Whistle-Blower's Firing

    RICHMOND, Va. - The former president and CEO of a security equipment company failed to prove that his termination was caused by activity protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled May 12 (Paul H. Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corporation, et al., No. 13-1849, 4th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8833).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Divided 6th Circuit: ERISA Does Not Protect Unsolicited Complaints

    CINCINNATI - Employee Retirement Income Security Act Section 510 does not protect a one-time unsolicited complaint to an employer about alleged violations of ERISA, a divided Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled May 9 (Brian Sexton v. Panel Processing, Inc., et al., No. 13-1604, 6th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8752).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Labor Board Invites The Filing Of Briefs In College Athletes' Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - The National Labor Relations Board on May 12 issued a notice and invitation to file briefs in a case concerning whether Northwestern University's football players who receive scholarships to play football at the university are employees under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and are entitled to vote on whether to be represented by the College Athletes Players Association (CAPA) for collective bargaining purposes (Northwestern University and College Athletes Players Association $(CAPA$), No. 13-RC-121359, NLRB).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Participant Seeks Reconsideration Of Ruling That Plan Assets Can Pay Judgment

    CHICAGO - Following an Illinois federal judge's ruling that using a profit-sharing plan's assets to satisfy a judgment against the plan for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act would not violate the exclusive benefit rule, fiduciary duty requirements or prohibited transaction rules of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a plan participant on May 9 filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking a ruling exempting her plan assets from being subject to satisfaction of the outstanding judgment pursuant to ERISA's anti-alienation provisions (David R. Gray, Jr. v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., et al., No. 12 C 6281, N.D. Ill.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58171).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Costco Removes Wage-And-Hour Class Suit To Federal Court

    SAN DIEGO - Costco Wholesale Corp. on May 7 removed a class complaint that was filed in the San Diego County Superior Court by pharmacists and managers alleging various wage violations to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, asserting original jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act, original jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code Section 1332(a)(1) and removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code Sections 1441(a) and 1446 (Paula Dittmar, et al. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al., No. 14-1156, S.D. Calif.).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - Michigan Federal Judge Rules Pension Plan Is ERISA Church Plan

    DETROIT - A federal judge in Michigan on May 9 granted a Catholic health organization's motion to dismiss a class action complaint brought by a participant in its pension plan who is challenging the organization's claims that its pension plans are church plans exempt from the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, finding that the organization is controlled by or associated with a church (Marilyn Overall v. Ascension Health, et al., No. 13-11396, E.D. Mich.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64116).

    Mealey's Labor & Employment - 8th Circuit: Substantial- Compliance Doctrine Is Inapplicable

    ST. LOUIS - The substantial-compliance doctrine does not interfere with discretion granted to a plan administrator by an ERISA plan, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled May 8 in affirming that an insurer did not abuse its discretion in denying a widow's claim to receive the proceeds of her husband's life insurance policy (Jane Marie Hall v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al., No. 13-1332, 8th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8652).