WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on July 1 granted review of a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the Natural Gas Act (NGA) does not preempt state law claims asserted by retail purchasers of natural gas (In re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation [ONEOK, Inc., et al. v. Learjet, Inc.], No. 13-271, U.S. Sup.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Compensation expert Kenneth Feinberg on June 30 outlined the details of a program for compensating claimants alleging death or injury in accidents related to defective General Motors (GM) ignition switches.
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 agreed to determine whether a dismissal in a consolidated action can be immediately appealed, regardless of whether claims remain in the consolidated action, in granting a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation who alleged that several banks rigged the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) (Ellen Gelboim, et al. v. Credit Suisse Group AG, et al., No. 13-1174, U.S. Sup.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 let stand a ruling by California's highest court that Congress has not barred a state unfair competition law (UCL) consumer class action against Bank of America N.A. predicated on a violation of the federal Truth in Savings Act (TISA) (Bank of America, N.A. v. Harold C. Rose, et al., No. 13-662, U.S. Sup.).
SANTA ANA, Calif. - The delayed accrual doctrine does not prevent the statute of limitations from barring a homeowner's claim under California's unfair competition law (UCL) that a lender misrepresented the terms of a mortgage because the homeowner should have learned the terms of the mortgage when he signed the loan agreement, a state appellate panel held June 25 (Azubueze Jiagbogu v. Bank of America, N.A., No. G048858, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 3).
HOUSTON - Steel producers and distributors that were ordered to pay $156 million in treble damages on claims that they conspired to put distributor MM Steel LP out of business by engaging in a group boycott in violation of federal antitrust law on June 24 and 25 filed notices of appeal to the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals of the amended final judgment following the trial court's denial of their motions for a new trial (MM Steel, LP, et al. v. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., et al., No. 4:12-cv-01227, S.D. Texas).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A consumer cannot pursue class claims alleging that Gerber Products Co. misrepresents the contents of its baby foods in violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) because it is not "administratively feasible" to determine whether a person is a class member, a federal judge held June 23 in denying class certification (Natalia Bruton v. Gerber Products Company, No. 12-2412, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86581).
SAN DIEGO - A federal judge on June 23 dismissed a California consumer's class action claims that Wal-Mart Inc. violates the state unfair competition law (UCL) by misrepresenting the benefits of a dietary supplement product after finding that the consumer failed to allege facts establishing a minimum regulatory standard for the supplement (Thamar Santisteban Cortina v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 13-2054, S.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85941).
BOISE, Idaho - A federal judge in Idaho on June 25 granted a stay of the divestiture of a consummated merger between Idaho's largest health system and the state's largest independent, multispecialty physician group pending the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal's ruling on the emergency motion for stay (Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa, Inc., et al. v. St. Luke's Health System, Ltd., No. 12-560, D. Idaho; Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. St. Luke's Health System, Ltd., et al., No. 13-116, D. Idaho).
WILMINGTON, Del. - Eaton Corp. and ZF Meritor LLC and Meritor Transmission Corp. told a federal judge in Delaware on June 23, on the eve of trial, that they had reached a settlement on claims for antitrust damages based on Eaton's entering into long-term conditional-rebate agreements (LTAs) with customers (ZF Meritor LLC, et al. v. Eaton Corporation, No. 1:06-cv-00623, D. Del.).
PHILADELPHIA - Direct purchasers cannot establish as a matter of law an overall antitrust conspiracy to restrain trade in the modafinil market based on bilateral reverse settlement agreements between prescription drug manufacturer Cephalon and four generic drug manufacturers, a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled June 23 in granting motions for summary judgment filed by Cephalon and the generic defendants and denying the motion for summary judgment filed by the direct purchaser class plaintiffs (King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., No. 2:06-cv-1797, E.D. Pa.; Vista Healthplan, Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., No. 2:06-cv-1833, E.D. Pa.; Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., No. 2:06-cv-2768, E.D. Pa.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84818).
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on June 19 certified a class of consumers who are suing the maker of a dietary supplement that is advertised as having aphrodisiac properties, alleging the product didn't live up to its labeling claims (Frank Ortega, et al. v. Natural Balance, Inc., et al., No. 13-5942, C.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84391).
SAN FRANCISCO - The San Francisco city attorney on June 23 used the hammer of $2,500 per-violation penalties under California's "tough" unfair competition law (UCL) in demanding that several companies, including Apple Inc., stop offering computer apps that allow the companies and motorists to sell public parking spaces.
ST. LOUIS - The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 20 ruled that the association and law firms representing National Football League (NFL) players may seek relief from a stipulation of dismissal in a lawsuit alleging unlawful salary caps under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) based on new evidence that the players claim shows that the dismissal was procured via fraud, misrepresentation or misconduct (Reggie White, et al. v. National Football League, et al., Nos. 13-1251 and 13-1480, 8th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11623).
LOS ANGELES - There are genuine issues of fact about whether an apparel company's marketing of a skull design violates California's unfair competition law (UCL) and infringes the copyright and trademark for another company's design, a federal judge held June 16 in denying summary judgment to both parties (Lambert Corp. v. LBJC Inc., et al., No. 13-00778, C.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83108).
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on June 13 declined to certify three classes of consumers, who are suing ConAgra Foods Inc. over allegedly deceptive and misleading labels, finding that each of the classes failed to meet several requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Levi Jones, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., No. 12-1633, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81292).
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A federal magistrate judge on June 17 recommended entering default judgment and an injunction against a California company and its CEO after finding that a bakery products company stated valid false advertising, copyright infringement and unfair business practice claims under federal law and the state unfair competition law (UCL) (Back Shop Tiefkuhl GmbH, v. GN Trade, Inc., et al., No. 12-0540, E.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82500).
NEW YORK - Apple Inc. reached a settlement with states and consumers on June 16 in litigation in which the judge previously found that Apple conspired with publishers to fix the prices of electronic books, heading off a trial on damages that was scheduled to begin Aug. 25 in federal court in New York (In re Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, No. 11-md-02293 [State of Texas v. Penguin Group [USA], Inc., No. 12-cv-3394], S.D. N.Y.).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A putative class may proceed with its state law unfair competition and common law right of publicity claims against LinkedIn Corp., a California federal judge ruled June 12, finding that the plaintiffs had standing and had sufficiently alleged injury to proceed against the social network operator (Paul Perkins, et al. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 13-cv-04303, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81042).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California man's claims that a bank's mortgage lending practices violate the state's unfair competition law (UCL) fail because he did not plead any facts to support allegations that the bank engaged in unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business acts or practices, a federal judge held June 13 in granting the bank's motion to dismiss the claims (Edward Lawrence v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 14-1272, N.D. Calif.; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81278).
SAN FRANCISCO - A homeowner has standing to pursue California unfair competition law (UCL) claims alleging that a lender made misrepresentations about a loan modification under the federal Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) because he properly asserted that he was injured by the lender's actions, a state appellate court held June 12 in reversing a trial court's ruling (Daniel Pestana v. Bank of America, N.A., No. A137566, Calif. App., 1st Dist., Div. 1).
LOS ANGELES - The Los Angeles Clippers (LAC Basketball Club Inc.) and The Sterling Family Trust violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the California unfair competition law by failing to pay interns, a former intern alleges in his class complaint filed June 10 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Frank Cooper, et al. v. LAC Basketball Club, Inc., et al., No. 14-4445, C.D. Calif.).
OAKLAND, Calif. - The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and four former student athletes filed a notice of settlement in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on June 9 in the class suit alleging misappropriation of the plaintiffs' names, images and likenesses for use in NCAA-branded video games in violation of rights-of-publicity laws in Indiana and California (Samuel Michael Keller, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al., No. 09-1967, N.D. Calif.).
ELGIN, Ill. - An insurer has a duty to defend its insured and additional insured against an underlying antitrust lawsuit stemming from the insured's adoption of two ordinances requiring the use of radio transmitters, an Illinois appeals panel affirmed June 9 (American Alternative Insurance Co. v. Lisle Woodridge Fire Protection District, et al., No. 2-13-0803, Ill. App., 2nd Dist.; 2014 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1174).
JONESBORO, Ark. - Two physicians and an ambulatory surgery center on June 5 sued a joint venture physician hospital organization and a health insurer in an Arkansas federal court, alleging antitrust violations (Tri State Advanced Surgery Center, et al. v. Health Choice, et al., No. 14-143, E.D. Ark.).