ATLANTA - The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Sept. 20 asked the Texas Supreme Court to rule whether a pelvic mesh plaintiff has to know of the defendant's alleged wrongdoing before her claim accrues under the Texas discovery rule (Ann Marie Bergin v. Mentor Worldwide LLC, et al., No. 16-14364, 11th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18199).
TRENTON, N.J. - A plaintiff's failure to respond to a motion to dismiss her class suit accusing the Princeton University trustees of mishandling the university's retirement plan did not entirely doom her suit as a New Jersey federal judge, on Sept. 19, ruled that the plaintiff partially stated claims for relief as to breach of the duty of prudence and granted leave to amend the other dismissed claims (Elysee Nicolas, et al. v. The Trustees of Princeton University, No. 17-3695, D. N.J., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151775).
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - The Florida Supreme Court should use an asbestos case to adopt the superior standard for reviewing evidence espoused in Daubert regardless of the constitutionality of the Legislature's attempt to do so and reject the opinion that any exposure to asbestos contributes to disease, an advocacy group told the court on Sept. 20 (Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co., et al., No. SC16-2182, Fla. Sup.).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - The U.S. government in a Sept. 20 brief tells a California federal court that Google Inc. should be sanctioned for its refusal to comply with a Stored Communications Act (SCA) warrant seeking production of foreign-stored emails, but the government opposes the tech firm's motion for a contempt order, seeking a hearing to determine a sanction appropriate for Google's willful actions (In re: Search of Content That is Stored at Premises Controlled by Google, No. 3:16-mc-80263, N.D. Calif.).
CAMDEN, N.J. - Granting in part a motion for a protective order by the New Jersey attorney general, a New Jersey federal magistrate judge on Sept. 19 concluded that many of the documents sought by an Indian tribe that is suing over state tribal recognition policies are protected by the attorney-client and deliberative process privileges (Nanticoke Lenni-Lenape Tribal Nation v, Christopher S. Porrino, No. 1:15-cv-05645, Court, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151410).
CHICAGO - An Illinois federal judge on Sept. 21 granted preliminary approval of a $4.8 million settlement to be paid by an employer to its janitors around the county for time they spent working before their scheduled shifts (Brice Ikby Binissia, et al. v. ABM Industries, Inc., et al., No. 13-1230, Veronica Brown, et al. v. ABM Industries, Inc., et al., No. 15-6729, N.D. Ill., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153686).
DENVER - A Colorado federal judge on Sept. 19 declined to exclude design defect opinions of an expert for a man who was paralyzed in a rollover crash of a pickup truck, saying the defendant manufacturers' objections relate to the weight that should be given to the expert's testimony and not whether the opinions are admissible (Daniel Pertile, et al. v. General Motors, LLC, et al., No. 15-cv-0518, D. Colo., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152342).
NEW YORK - A federal judge in New York on Sept. 19 substantially rejected a motion to dismiss filed by defendants in a securities class action lawsuit, ruling that the lead plaintiff in the action has properly pleaded a majority of its federal securities law claims (In re VEON Ltd. Securities Litigation, No. 15-8672, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152240).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California digital company on Sept. 20 announced that its subsidiaries have filed a notice of international arbitration against Toshiba Corp. in relation to flash-memory drive joint ventures.
FORT MYERS, Fla. - A Florida federal judge on Sept. 19 refused to dismiss a Brazilian entity's amended complaint in which it seeks to enforce a $14 million arbitral award, finding that the complaint was not barred by a three-year statute of limitations (Kozma Investmentos, Ltda. v. Edson Pereira Duda, et al., No. 2:17-cv-306, M.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151781).
TAMPA, Fla. - A Florida federal judge on Sept. 18 certified a class of home health workers who sued their former employer under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act claiming that they were fired without notice and denied pay (Toni Molina, et al. v. Ace Homecare LLC, et al., No. 16-2214, M.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151039).
CHICAGO - An Illinois federal judge on Sept. 18 granted conditional certification in a wage-and-hour lawsuit filed by individuals paid to catch chickens who allege that their piece-rate pay violates the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) (Jimmy R. Nicks, et al. v. Koch Meat Co., Inc., et al., No. 16-6446, N.D. Ill., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150763).
CHICAGO - The user of a photo mobile application who consented to sending invitations to all of his contacts in exchange for free storage space cannot now sue the app creator for using his name when contacting his contacts, an Illinois federal judge ruled Sept. 20, finding that the class complaint fails due to the user's express consent (Danny Pratt v. Everalbum, Inc., No. 17-1600, N.D. Ill., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152763).
SAN FRANCISCO - In a motion seeking interlocutory review, an insurer argues that whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires an insurer to provide access to lactation services or merely forbids financial barriers to obtaining such services is exactly the type of question the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals should address and, in an answer to the complaint filed Sept. 19 in a California federal court, the insurer says the plaintiffs' fail to state a claim under either the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the ACA on which relief can be based (Rachel Condry, et al. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al., No. 17-183, N.D. Calif.).
WHEELING, W.Va. - An engineering expert can opine that nearby coal-mining operations caused subsidence damage to a couple's property in West Virginia, a federal judge held Sept. 18, finding that the expert's opinion is both reliable and helpful and that the late production of the expert's report is excusable (Christopher Clark, et al. v. McElroy Coal Company, et al., No. 5:16-cv-137, N.D. W.Va., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152125).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A District of Columbia federal judge on Sept. 19 dismissed a consolidated class action against the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) related to a series of 2015 data breaches that compromised employees' personally identifiable information (PII), finding that the two plaintiff employee unions failed to allege the necessary injuries or sufficient facts to establish standing under the asserted statutes (In Re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 1:15-mc-01394, D. D.C., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151449).
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - A federal judge in Tennessee on Sept. 19 granted a motion filed by a man accused of orchestrating a telemarketing scheme to sell insurance products that were not major medical health insurance, finding that he should be allowed to review recordings of approximately 100,000 sales calls to establish a good faith defense (United States of America v. Timothy Thomas, No. 14-182, M.D. Tenn., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152336).
TAMPA, Fla. - A rental property owner seeking class certification in a suit over the constitutionality of a Florida city's rental housing program failed to prove the ascertainability and numerosity of its proposed class, a Florida federal judge ruled Sept. 19 (Lea Family Partnership Ltd., et al. v. City of Temple Terrace, Florida, et al., No. 16-3463, M.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151405).
BAY CITY, Mich. - A Michigan federal judge on Sept. 15 dismissed a class lawsuit accusing a Michigan county and one of its employees of violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by marking tires of parked cars prior to issuing parking tickets (Alison Patricia Taylor v. City of Saginaw, et al., No. 17-11067, E.D. Mich., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149846).
NEW YORK - The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Sept. 18 affirmed a ruling in which a district court found that a motorman who was injured while working aboard a vessel must arbitrate his claims against his employer in the Philippines pursuant to his employment contract (Rodrigo R. Pagaduan v. Carnival Corporation, et al., No. 16-465, 2nd Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17981).
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - An expert witness for a woman who says her paralysis was caused by medical malpractice was excluded from testifying by a Puerto Rico federal judge, who ruled Sept. 18 that the expert's opinion on the cause of the paralysis is useless because, despite the woman's claims to the contrary, the evidence shows that she is not in fact paraplegic (Aglaed Gonzalez Rivera v. Centro Medico Del Turabo, Inc. D/B/A Hospital Himacaguas, et al., No. 15-1538, D. Puerto Rico, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151189).
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - A man whose mother died in a Florida nursing home after the air conditioning system broke following Hurricane Irma filed suit on Sept. 15 against the home, its owners and administrative staff, seeking a pure bill of discovery and to preclude the home, its staff and owner from destroying evidence that could lead to who is responsible for his mother's death (Francis L. Lopez v. Rehabilitation Center At Hollywood Hills LLC, et al., No. CACE17016659, Fla. 17th Jud. Cir. Broward Co.).
SAN DIEGO - After finding that a consumer sufficiently pleaded that she relied on various representations regarding the health benefits of coconut oil, a California federal judge on Sept. 18 denied a motion filed by the maker of the product to dismiss the purchaser's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other causes of action (Syndi Tracton v. Viva Labs Inc., No. 16-cv-2772, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151178).
TAMPA, Fla. - A Florida federal judge on Sept. 14 denied an unopposed motion by the plaintiff in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) lawsuit to file the motion for class certification under seal, ruling that claims that information in the motion was declared confidential by the defendant is insufficient to overcome the public's right of access (Melanie Glasser, et al. v. Hilton Grand Vacations Company, LLC, No. 16-952, M.D. Fla., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149332).
PASADENA, Calif. - A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Sept. 15 reversed a trial court's decertification of a class of consumers suing a supplement maker for allegedly including false claims on the labels of its aphrodisiac supplements, ruling that the trial court abused its discretion when it based its decision on the lead plaintiff's inability to provide restitution damages through the full refund model (Troy Lambert, et al. v. Nutraceutical Corp., No. 15-56423, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17923).