NEWARK, N.J. - The bare metal defense entitles three product manufacturers to summary judgment, a judge said before remanding the remainder of the asbestos action on June 26 (Linda Hammell, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., et al., No. 14-13, D. N.J.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83154, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83153, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83152).
ORLANDO, Fla. - A genuine dispute exists over whether a subcontractor caused any delays in a construction project, a Florida magistrate judge found June 26, denying summary judgment to a contractor and its surety (The Davis Group Inc. v. Ace Electric Inc. and The Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., No. 14-251, M.D. Fla.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83368).
PHILADELPHIA - A holding by a New Jersey federal judge that a settlement of patent litigation that involves only an agreement to relinquish the right to produce an "authorized generic" (no-AG agreement) did not implicate federal antitrust law was vacated by the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 26 (King Drug Company of Florence Inc. et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al., No. 14-1243, 3rd Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10859).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 26 denied a petition to appeal class certification granted in suit over the alleged denial of long-term care alternatives to Medicaid recipients in the District of Columbia (In re: District of Columbia, a municipal corporation, No. 14-8001, D.C. Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10849).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The question of whether copyright protection for software extends to all elements of the original work, even when those elements could have been written in more than one way, will not be answered by the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied certiorari in a high-profile dispute between Google Inc. and Oracle America Inc. on June 29 (Google Inc. v. Oracle America Inc., No. 14-410, U.S. Sup.).
PHOENIX - An Arizona appeals panel on June 25 ordered a state court judge to determine if a construction company waived its due process rights when entering into a contract that required it to resolve any disputes through the Arizona Board of Regents' (ABOR) administrative procedures, ruling that he abused his discretion when considering evidence outside of the pleadings when dismissing the lawsuit (Holder Construction Group LLC v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al., No. 1 CA-CV 14-0390, Ariz. App., Div. 1; 2015 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 848).
PASADENA, Calif. - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 23, in a ruling affirming the dismissal of a class complaint, declined to expand the coverage of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act to online transactions (Michael Ambers, et al. v. Buy.com, Inc., No. 13-55953, 9th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10614).
MEMPHIS, Tenn. - A psychologist can testify about whether a fitness exam for an airport police officer was job related and consistent with business necessity but must wait until trial for a determination on whether the officer's supervisor acted in a reasonable and prudent manner by relieving the officer of duty and referring her for the exam, a Tennessee federal judge held June 25 (Rosalyn Small v. Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority, et al., No. 2:13-cv-02437, W.D. Tenn.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82523).
LOS ANGELES - A trial court properly concluded that an employer shifted the burden of summary judgment and that plaintiffs failed to create triable issues, a California appeals court held June 24 (Teresa Quiroz, et al. v. BNSF Railway Co., No. B250165, Calif. App., 2nd Dist.; 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4426).
NEW YORK - In an electronic order, a federal judge in New York on June 25 unsealed a number of related reinsurance disputes and ordered that a consolidated complaint be filed (National Indemnity Company v. IRB Brasil Resseguros S.A., No. 15-cv-01165; National Indemnity Company v. IRB Brasil Resseguros S.A., No. 15-cv-02939; National Indemnity Company v. IRB Brasil Resseguros S.A., No. 15-cv-03310 and National Indemnity Company v. IRB Brasil Resseguros S.A., No. 15-cv-03975, S.D. N.Y.).
CHICAGO - An Illinois federal judge on June 23 granted an insurer's motion to dismiss an office supply company insured's counterclaim alleging that it is entitled to declaratory relief regarding the insurer's indemnification duties in an underlying lawsuit alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition and civil conspiracy (Sentinel Insurance Co. v. Yorktown Industries Inc., No. 14 CV 4212, N.D. Ill., Eastern Div.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81419).
NEW YORK - A New York federal court properly limited or excluded expert testimony for three defendants convicted of submitting false disability claims to the Long Island Railroad's (LIRR) Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) and properly allowed expert testimony by a government witness, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held June 22 in affirming the convictions (United States of America v. Joseph Rutigliano, et al., Nos. 14-152, 14-759, 14-1339, 2nd Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10425).
BOSTON - A professional engineer expert can testify about the design of a metal treestand that broke when a deer hunter stepped on it, sending the hunter falling to the ground, because the expert is sufficiently qualified and his testimony is relevant and reliable, a Massachusetts federal judge ruled June 23 (David Garfield v. Gorilla, Inc., et al., No. 13-12810, D. Mass.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81236).
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana federal judge on June 25 allowed an industrial hygienist's asbestos-exposure testimony, over defense complaints that he lacked sufficient experience with mastics or adhesives. The judge previously admitted deposition testimony finding that an insurer's interests were represented by a predecessor in interest and said plaintiffs could raise challenges to defense experts in cross-examination (Sally Gros Vedros, et al. v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding Inc., et al., No. 11-1198, E.D. La.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82672).
WILMINGTON, Del. - Ford Motor Co. and a woman who claims that it fatally exposed her husband to asbestos settled the action after five days of trial, according to a June 24 docket entry. The federal judge overseeing the case previously declined to sanction Ford for failing to produce certain documents, citing the plaintiff's familiarity with the testimony (In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, Olga Pavlick, et al. v. Advance Stores Company Inc., et al., No. 10-174, D. Del.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81504).
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - A New York federal judge on June 23 denied dueling motions for summary judgment in a coverage dispute arising from alleged breaches of contractual obligations under two promissory notes and a consulting agreement by the insured and its directors and officers (Intelligent Digital Systems LLC, et al. v. Beazley Insurance Company Inc., No. 12-1209, E.D. N.Y.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82742).
SHREVEPORT, La. - A Louisiana federal jury on June 23 awarded a former Union Pacific Railroad Co. employee, who accused the company of retaliation, $375,000 in damages (Jeffrey Davis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, No. 12-2738, W.D. La.).
INDIANAPOLIS - An exception to the Indianapolis no-smoking ordinance for satellite facilities constitutes unconstitutional disparate treatment, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled June 24 (Whistle Stop Inn Inc., et al. v. City of Indianapolis, et al., No. 49A02-1407-MI-519, Ind. App.).
ELGIN, Ill. - An insurer has no duty to defend an insured against underlying allegations of improper design and implementation of a solution to logistical and supply chain processes, an Illinois appeals panel affirmed June 25 (Century Surety Co. v. Winchester Industrial Controls LLC, No. 2-14-0969, Ill. App., 2nd Dist.; 2015 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1403).
CHICAGO - Less than a month after it was determined that most of the part-time faculty of a Chicago-based university may vote on union representation because the university failed to meet its burden of establishing that those employees serve a religious function, the National Labor Relations Board Region 13 acting regional director on June 23 ruled that the same university is subject to the NLRB's jurisdiction in an organizing dispute with its full- and regular part-time housekeepers (Saint Xavier University and Service Employees International Union Local 1, No. 13-92296, NLRB Region 13).