TRENTON, N.J. - A unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court on Jan. 24 reinstated a $25.15 million Accutane bowel injury verdict after finding that New Jersey's statute of limitations and discovery rule apply to the plaintiff's claim and not Alabama's more restrictive law (Andrew McCarrell v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., et al., No. A-28 September Term 2015 076524, N.J. Sup.; 2017 N.J. LEXIS 19).
NEWARK, N.J. - A New Jersey federal judge on Jan. 19 partially granted an insurer's motion for summary judgment in an environmental contamination coverage suit involving missing policies after determining that the limits for the missing policies must be capped at $5,000 per accident and $25,000 in the aggregate (E.M. Sergeant Pulp & Chemical Co. Inc., et al. v. The Travelers Indemnity Co. Inc., et al., No. 12-1741, D. N.J.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7231).
TRENTON, N.J. - Additional discovery is needed into two Canadian companies' contacts with New Jersey so that a woman can fairly contest motions to dismiss her asbestos action on jurisdictional grounds, a federal judge in New Jersey said Jan. 9 (Estelle Grimes, et al. v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. 15-8466, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181534).
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that a California choice-of-law clause in Facebook Inc.'s terms of service is enforceable, a California federal judge on Jan. 9 granted the social media's company's motion to dismiss claims for violation of the New Jersey Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act (TCCWNA) (Jose Palomino, et al. v. Facebook Inc., No. 16-cv-04230, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2971).
TRENTON, N.J. - A federal judge in New Jersey on Jan. 3 dismissed fraudulent concealment and breach of express and implied warranty claims in a suit in which a man claims that he was injured by a phone that hit him in the face while on a roller coaster at Six Flags Great Adventure because the man did not particularly specify how the park was hiding evidence from him and that his ticket to get into the park was not a "good" under New Jersey law (Evan Huzinec v. Six Flags Great Adventure LLC, No. 16-2754, D. N.J.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 555).
TRENTON, N.J. - A New Jersey appellate panel on Dec. 29 affirmed a chancery court judge's decision to dismiss a company's declaratory judgment suit against the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), finding that the plaintiff company is required to comply with the requirements of the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA) (Drytech Inc. v. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, No. A-5619-14T4, N.J. Super., App. Div.; 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2750).
TRENTON, N.J. - A federal judge in New Jersey on Dec. 20 refused to reconsider his previous ruling that dismissed the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) from a lawsuit brought by environmental groups who had contended that the authority and the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) were liable for discharging chemicals into the groundwater (Raritan Baykeeper Inc., et al. v. NL Industries Inc., et al., No. 09-4117, D. N.J.).
TRENTON, N.J. - New Jersey's banking and insurance commissioner on Dec. 15 asked a state court to order an insolvent Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) consumer-operated and oriented plan insurer's liquidation (Richard J. Badolato, Commissioner of the Department of Banking and Insurance of New Jersey v. Freelancers Consumer Operated and Oriented Program of New Jersey d/b/a Health Republic Insurance of New Jersey, No. MCR-C-000063-16, N.J. Super., Mercer Co., Chancery Div.).
TRENTON, N.J. - Although excluding an expert from testifying on retail safety operations, a New Jersey federal judge on Dec. 19 declined to grant summary judgment to Whole Foods Market because fact issues exist as to whether it showed "reasonable or due care" by placing a yellow warning sign near a spill until an employee returned with a mop (Gabriela Puerto v. Whole Foods Market, et al., No. 14-5118, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174714).
TRENTON, N.J. - The New Jersey Supreme Court on Dec. 12 agreed to hear an appeal concerning whether New Jersey law applies to insurance allocation determinations in an asbestos coverage dispute and whether the insured has to share in those coverage allocations after excess coverage for the asbestos bodily injury claims was no longer available (Continental Insurance Co., et al. v. Honeywell International Inc., et al., No. A-21-16, N.J. Sup.).
CAMDEN, N.J. - The owner of a labor staffing firm and the manager committed workers' compensation fraud when misrepresenting the job descriptions of its employees in an attempt to obtain avoid paying for workers' compensation insurance, a federal judge in New Jersey ruled Dec. 14 in granting in part Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co.'s motion for summary judgment (Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company v. Quickstuff LLC, et al., No. 14-6105, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172522).
NEWARK, N.J. - The Securities and Exchange Commission on Dec. 12 sued two stock traders in New Jersey federal court, alleging that the traders engaged in a "lucrative fraudulent market manipulation scheme" that provided them with $26 million in illicit profits in violation of federal securities laws (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph Taub, et al., No. 16-9130, D. N.J.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Almost 100 federal lawsuits alleging that the diabetes drug Invokana causes diabetic ketoacidosis and kidney damages were centralized Dec. 7 before Judge Brian R. Martinotti of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (In Re: Invokana [Canagliflozin] Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2750, JPMDL).
NEWARK, N.J. - Plaintiffs in a class action suit alleging that Mercedes-Benz USA LLC misrepresented the efficiency of its BlueTec Clean Diesel vehicles lack standing to bring their action against the auto maker, a federal judge in New Jersey ruled Dec. 6, finding that the plaintiffs failed to show that the advertisements they allegedly relied on contained any false statements (In re: Mercedes-Benz Emissions Litigation, No. 16-881, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168535).
TRENTON, N.J. - A federal judge in New Jersey on Dec. 2 appointed an investor group as lead plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company and certain of its executive officers, ruling that the investor group has the largest financial stake in the litigation and meets all statutory requirements to serve as lead plaintiff (David Lewis v. Lipocine Inc., et al. No. 16-4009, D. N.J. and Anthony Morassi, et al. v. Lipocine Inc., et al., No. 16-4067, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166532).
TRENTON, N.J. - A federal judge in New Jersey on Dec. 2 appointed an investor group as lead plaintiff in a securities class action lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company and certain of its executive officers, ruling that the investor group has the largest financial stake in the litigation and meets all statutory requirements to serve as lead plaintiff (David Lewis v. Lipocine Inc., et al., No. 16-4009, D. N.J., and Anthony Morassi, et al. v. Lipocine Inc., et al., No. 16-4067, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166532).
NEWARK, N.J.- A New Jersey federal judge on Dec. 5 refused to grant a motion filed by a debt collector to dismiss claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), finding that she adequately pleaded her claims in relation to the instructions she was given on obtaining a verification of the debt (Milagros Fontanez, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Stern & Eisenberg, P.C., No. 16-1562, D. N.J.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167172).
NEWARK, N.J. - In a Nov. 22 reply brief in New Jersey federal court, Viacom Inc. argues that it is entitled to summary judgment on the sole remaining intrusion upon seclusion claim in a remanded putative class action over purported collection of personally identifiable information (PII) from minors because the evidence clearly shows that it did not collect any "real-world identifying details" about users of its Nickelodeon websites (In Re: Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation, No. 2:12-cv-07829, D. N.J.).
TRENTON, N.J. - Insurers' coverage obligations in a mold damages suit can be adjudicated only after the insureds' liability for the damages caused by the mold contamination is resolved, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court determined Nov. 21 (Larry Chenault v. Victory Highlands Condominium Association Inc., et al., Nos. A-3626-14T4, A-3627-14T4, A-3628-14T4, N.J. Super., App. Div.; 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2500).
PHILADELPHIA - A company with restaurants in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware will pay $1.29 million to settle claims that it wrongfully used a tip credit when paying its servers and bartenders as it required those tipped employees to share those tips with other workers (Matthew Schaub, et al. v. Chesapeake & Delaware Brewing Holdings and Iron Hill Brewery, LLC, No. 16-756, E.D. Pa.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157203).